I\'m trying to do the opposite of \"Detect if stdin is a terminal or pipe?\".
I\'m running an application that\'s changing its output format because it detects a pip
Updating @A-Ron's answer to
a) work on both Linux & MacOs
b) propagate status code indirectly (since MacOs script
does not support it)
faketty () {
# Create a temporary file for storing the status code
tmp=$(mktemp)
# Ensure it worked or fail with status 99
[ "$tmp" ] || return 99
# Produce a script that runs the command provided to faketty as
# arguments and stores the status code in the temporary file
cmd="$(printf '%q ' "$@")"'; echo $? > '$tmp
# Run the script through /bin/sh with fake tty
if [ "$(uname)" = "Darwin" ]; then
# MacOS
script -Fq /dev/null /bin/sh -c "$cmd"
else
script -qfc "/bin/sh -c $(printf "%q " "$cmd")" /dev/null
fi
# Ensure that the status code was written to the temporary file or
# fail with status 99
[ -s $tmp ] || return 99
# Collect the status code from the temporary file
err=$(cat $tmp)
# Remove the temporary file
rm -f $tmp
# Return the status code
return $err
}
Examples:
$ faketty false ; echo $?
1
$ faketty echo '$HOME' ; echo $?
$HOME
0
embedded_example () {
faketty perl -e 'sleep(5); print "Hello world\n"; exit(3);' > LOGFILE 2>&1 </dev/null &
pid=$!
# do something else
echo 0..
sleep 2
echo 2..
echo wait
wait $pid
status=$?
cat LOGFILE
echo Exit status: $status
}
$ embedded_example
0..
2..
wait
Hello world
Exit status: 3
Referring previous answer, on Mac OS X, "script" can be used like below...
script -q /dev/null commands...
But, because it may replace "\n" with "\r\n" on the stdout, you may also need script like this:
script -q /dev/null commands... | perl -pe 's/\r\n/\n/g'
If there are some pipe between these commands, you need to flush stdout. for example:
script -q /dev/null commands... | ruby -ne 'print "....\n";STDOUT.flush' | perl -pe 's/\r\n/\n/g'
I don't know if it's doable from PHP, but if you really need the child process to see a TTY, you can create a PTY.
In C:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <sysexits.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <pty.h>
int main(int argc, char **argv) {
int master;
struct winsize win = {
.ws_col = 80, .ws_row = 24,
.ws_xpixel = 480, .ws_ypixel = 192,
};
pid_t child;
if (argc < 2) {
printf("Usage: %s cmd [args...]\n", argv[0]);
exit(EX_USAGE);
}
child = forkpty(&master, NULL, NULL, &win);
if (child == -1) {
perror("forkpty failed");
exit(EX_OSERR);
}
if (child == 0) {
execvp(argv[1], argv + 1);
perror("exec failed");
exit(EX_OSERR);
}
/* now the child is attached to a real pseudo-TTY instead of a pipe,
* while the parent can use "master" much like a normal pipe */
}
I was actually under the impression that expect itself does creates a PTY, though.
Based on Chris' solution, I came up with the following little helper function:
faketty() {
script -qfc "$(printf "%q " "$@")" /dev/null
}
The quirky looking printf
is necessary to correctly expand the script's arguments in $@
while protecting possibly quoted parts of the command (see example below).
Usage:
faketty <command> <args>
Example:
$ python -c "import sys; print sys.stdout.isatty()"
True
$ python -c "import sys; print sys.stdout.isatty()" | cat
False
$ faketty python -c "import sys; print sys.stdout.isatty()" | cat
True
Aha!
The script
command does what we want...
script --return --quiet -c "[executable string]" /dev/null
Does the trick!
Usage:
script [options] [file]
Make a typescript of a terminal session.
Options:
-a, --append append the output
-c, --command <command> run command rather than interactive shell
-e, --return return exit code of the child process
-f, --flush run flush after each write
--force use output file even when it is a link
-q, --quiet be quiet
-t[<file>], --timing[=<file>] output timing data to stderr or to FILE
-h, --help display this help
-V, --version display version
The unbuffer script that comes with Expect should handle this ok. If not, the application may be looking at something other than what its output is connected to, eg. what the TERM environment variable is set to.