I have a RxJS5 pipeline looks like this
Rx.Observable.from([2, 3, 4, 5, 6])
.takeWhile((v) => { v !== 4 })
I want to keep the subscrip
Since RxJS 6.4.0 this is now possible with takeWhile(predicate, true)
.
There's already an opened PR that adds an optional inclusive
parameter to takeWhile
: https://github.com/ReactiveX/rxjs/pull/4115
There're at least two possible workarounds:
using concatMap()
:
of('red', 'blue', 'green', 'orange').pipe(
concatMap(color => {
if (color === 'green') {
return of(color, null);
}
return of(color);
}),
takeWhile(color => color),
)
Using multicast()
:
of('red', 'blue', 'green', 'orange').pipe(
multicast(
() => new ReplaySubject(1),
subject => subject.pipe(
takeWhile((c) => c !== 'green'),
concat(subject.take(1),
)
),
)
I've been using this operator as well so I made it to my own set of additional RxJS 5 operators: https://github.com/martinsik/rxjs-extra#takewhileinclusive
This operator has been also discussed in this RxJS 5 issue: https://github.com/ReactiveX/rxjs/issues/2420
Jan 2019: Updated for RxJS 6
If your comparison is such that you know exactly what is the last element (like for !==
), you can re-add it yourself:
Rx.Observable.from([2, 3, 4, 5, 6])
.takeWhile((v) => v !== 4)
.concat(Rx.Observable.of(4))
.subscribe(console.log)
I came across the same problem, i needed the last element to be included so i chose to keep a reference to the subscription and unsubscribe within the onNext
callback when the condition was met. Using your example code it would be:
const subscription = Observable.of('red', 'blue', 'green', 'orange')
.subscribe(color => {
// Do something with the value here
if (color === 'green') {
subscription.unsubscribe()
}
})
This worked for me because it also caused the observable source to stop emitting which is what i needed in my scenario.
I realize that i'm not using takeWhile
operator but the the main goal is achieved and without any workarounds or extra code.
I'm not a fan of forcing things to work in a way that they were not designed to.
The disadvantages of this are:
onCompleted
does not get called for some reason if the last observer unsubscribes, but i checked that the source in fact stops emitting.In my case, I was unable to predict what the final value would be. I also just wanted a solution involving common, easy operators, and I wanted something I could reuse, so I couldn't rely on the values being truthy. The only thing I could think of was defining my own operator like this:
import { pipe, from } from 'rxjs';
import { switchMap, takeWhile, filter, map } from 'rxjs/operators';
export function doWhile<T>(shouldContinue: (a: T) => boolean) {
return pipe(
switchMap((data: T) => from([
{ data, continue: true },
{ data, continue: shouldContinue(data), exclude: true }
])),
takeWhile(message => message.continue),
filter(message => !message.exclude),
map(message => message.data)
);
}
It's a little weird, but it works for me and I can import it and use it.
UPDATE March 2019, rsjx
version 6.4.0
: takeWhile
finally have an optional inclusive
parameter that allows to keep the first element that breaks the condition. So now the solution would be simply to pass true as the second argument of takeWhile
:
import { takeWhile } from 'rxjs/operators';
import { from } from 'rxjs';
const cutOff = 4.5
const example = from([2, 3, 4, 5, 6])
.pipe(takeWhile(v => v < cutOff, true ))
const subscribe = example.subscribe(val =>
console.log('inclusive:', val)
);
outputs:
inclusive: 2
inclusive: 3
inclusive: 4
inclusive: 5
Live here:
https://stackblitz.com/edit/typescript-m7zjkr?embed=1&file=index.ts
Notice that 5 is the first element that breaks the condition. Notice that endWith
is not really a solution when you have dynamical conditions like v < cutOff
and you don't know what will be your last element.
Thanks @martin for pointing out the existence of this pull request.
You can use endWith(value)
which (unlike a lot of RxJS code)
is very nicely self documenting.
const example = source.pipe(
takeWhile(val => val != 4),
endWith(4));
PS. Also note that takeUntil
doesn't take a predicate, so if you were trying to use that operator to solve this problem you can't. It's a whole different method signature.
Official docs: https://rxjs-dev.firebaseapp.com/api/operators/endWith
https://stackblitz.com/edit/typescript-pvuawt