Why does range(start, end) not include end?

后端 未结 9 1185
夕颜
夕颜 2020-11-22 10:24
>>> range(1,11)

gives you

[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]

Why not 1-11?

Did they just decide to do it lik

相关标签:
9条回答
  • 2020-11-22 10:55

    Because it's more common to call range(0, 10) which returns [0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9] which contains 10 elements which equals len(range(0, 10)). Remember that programmers prefer 0-based indexing.

    Also, consider the following common code snippet:

    for i in range(len(li)):
        pass
    

    Could you see that if range() went up to exactly len(li) that this would be problematic? The programmer would need to explicitly subtract 1. This also follows the common trend of programmers preferring for(int i = 0; i < 10; i++) over for(int i = 0; i <= 9; i++).

    If you are calling range with a start of 1 frequently, you might want to define your own function:

    >>> def range1(start, end):
    ...     return range(start, end+1)
    ...
    >>> range1(1, 10)
    [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10]
    
    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-11-22 10:56

    Although there are some useful algorithmic explanations here, I think it may help to add some simple 'real life' reasoning as to why it works this way, which I have found useful when introducing the subject to young newcomers:

    With something like 'range(1,10)' confusion can arise from thinking that pair of parameters represents the "start and end".

    It is actually start and "stop".

    Now, if it were the "end" value then, yes, you might expect that number would be included as the final entry in the sequence. But it is not the "end".

    Others mistakenly call that parameter "count" because if you only ever use 'range(n)' then it does, of course, iterate 'n' times. This logic breaks down when you add the start parameter.

    So the key point is to remember its name: "stop". That means it is the point at which, when reached, iteration will stop immediately. Not after that point.

    So, while "start" does indeed represent the first value to be included, on reaching the "stop" value it 'breaks' rather than continuing to process 'that one as well' before stopping.

    One analogy that I have used in explaining this to kids is that, ironically, it is better behaved than kids! It doesn't stop after it supposed to - it stops immediately without finishing what it was doing. (They get this ;) )

    Another analogy - when you drive a car you don't pass a stop/yield/'give way' sign and end up with it sitting somewhere next to, or behind, your car. Technically you still haven't reached it when you do stop. It is not included in the 'things you passed on your journey'.

    I hope some of that helps in explaining to Pythonitos/Pythonitas!

    0 讨论(0)
  • Basically in python range(n) iterates n times, which is of exclusive nature that is why it does not give last value when it is being printed, we can create a function which gives inclusive value it means it will also print last value mentioned in range.

    def main():
        for i in inclusive_range(25):
            print(i, sep=" ")
    
    
    def inclusive_range(*args):
        numargs = len(args)
        if numargs == 0:
            raise TypeError("you need to write at least a value")
        elif numargs == 1:
            stop = args[0]
            start = 0
            step = 1
        elif numargs == 2:
            (start, stop) = args
            step = 1
        elif numargs == 3:
            (start, stop, step) = args
        else:
            raise TypeError("Inclusive range was expected at most 3 arguments,got {}".format(numargs))
        i = start
        while i <= stop:
            yield i
            i += step
    
    
    if __name__ == "__main__":
        main()
    
    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-11-22 11:01

    Exclusive ranges do have some benefits:

    For one thing each item in range(0,n) is a valid index for lists of length n.

    Also range(0,n) has a length of n, not n+1 which an inclusive range would.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-11-22 11:05

    It's just more convenient to reason about in many cases.

    Basically, we could think of a range as an interval between start and end. If start <= end, the length of the interval between them is end - start. If len was actually defined as the length, you'd have:

    len(range(start, end)) == start - end
    

    However, we count the integers included in the range instead of measuring the length of the interval. To keep the above property true, we should include one of the endpoints and exclude the other.

    Adding the step parameter is like introducing a unit of length. In that case, you'd expect

    len(range(start, end, step)) == (start - end) / step
    

    for length. To get the count, you just use integer division.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-11-22 11:11

    It's also useful for splitting ranges; range(a,b) can be split into range(a, x) and range(x, b), whereas with inclusive range you would write either x-1 or x+1. While you rarely need to split ranges, you do tend to split lists quite often, which is one of the reasons slicing a list l[a:b] includes the a-th element but not the b-th. Then range having the same property makes it nicely consistent.

    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题