I\'m in need of some clarification. I\'ve been reading about REST, and building RESTful applications. According to wikipedia, REST itself is defined to be Representation
Stateless means the state of the service doesn’t persist between subsequent requests and response. Each request carries its own user credentials and is individually authenticated. But in stateful each request is known from any prior request. All stateful requests are session-oriented i.e. each request need to know and retain changes made in previous requests.
Banking application is an example of stateful application. Where user first login then make transaction and logs out. If after logout user will try to make the transaction, he will not be able to do so.
Yes, http protocol is essentially a stateless protocol but to make it stateful we make us of HTTP cookies. So, is SOAP by default. But it can be make stateful likewise, depends upon framework you are using.
HTTP is stateless but still we can maintain session in our java application by using different session tracking mechanism.
Yes, We can also maintain session in webservice whether it is REST or SOAP. It can be implemented by using any third party library or you can implement by our own.
Taken from http://gopaldas.org/webservices/soap/webservice-is-stateful-or-stateless-rest-soap
When you develop a RESTful service, in order to be logged in you will need your user to be authenticated. A possible option would be to send the username and password each time you intend to do a user action. In this case the server will not store session-data at all.
Another option is to generate a session-id on the server and send it to the client, so the client will be able to send session-id to the server and authenticate with that. This is much much safer than sending username and password each time, since if somebody gets their hand on that data, then he/she can impersonate the user until the username and password is changed. You may say that even the session id can be stolen and the user will be impersonated in that case and you are right. However, in this case impersonating the user will only be possible while the session id is valid.
If the RESTful API expects username and password in order to change username and password, then even if somebody impersonated the user using the session id, the hacker will not be able to lock out the real user.
A session-id could be generated by one-way-locking (encryption) of something which identifies the user and adding the time to the session id, this way the session's expiry time could be defined.
The server may or may not store session ids. Of course, if the server stores the session id, then it would violate the criteria defined in the question. However, it is only important to make sure that the session id can be validated for the given user, which does not necessitate storing the session id. Imagine a way that you have a one-way-encryption of email, user id and some user-specific private data, like favorite color, this would be the first level and somehow adding the username date to the encrypted string and apply a two-way encryption. As a result when a session id is received, the second level could be decrypted to be able to determine which username the user claims to be and whether the session time is right. If this is valid, then the first level of encryption could be validated by doing that encryption again and checking whether it matches the string. You do not need to store session data in order to achieve that.
Statelessness means that every HTTP request happens in complete isolation. When the client makes an HTTP request, it includes all the information necessary for the server to fulfill that request. The server never relies on information from previous requests. If that information was important, the client would have to send it again in subsequent request. Statelessness also brings new features. It’s easier to distribute a stateless application across load-balanced servers. A stateless application is also easy to cache.
There are actually two kinds of state. Application State that lives on the client and Resource State that lives on the server.
A web service only needs to care about your application state when you’re actually making a request. The rest of the time, it doesn’t even know you exist. This means that whenever a client makes a request, it must include all the application states the server will need to process it.
Resource state is the same for every client, and its proper place is on the server. When you upload a picture to a server, you create a new resource: the new picture has its own URI and can be the target of future requests. You can fetch, modify, and delete this resource through HTTP.
Hope this helps differentiate what statelessness and various states mean.
REST is very abstract. It helps to have some good, simple, real-world examples.
Take for example all major social media apps -- Tumblr, Instagram, Facebook, and Twitter. They all have a forever-scrolling view where the farther you scroll down, the more content you see, further and further back in time. However, we've all experienced that moment where you lose where you were scrolled to, and the app resets you back to the top. Like if you quit the app, then when you reopen it, you're back at the top again.
The reason why, is because the server did not store your session state. Sadly, your scroll position was just stored in RAM on the client.
Fortunately you don't have to log back in when you reconnect, but that's only because your client-side also stored login certificate has not expired. Delete and reinstall the app, and you're going to have to log back in, because the server did not associate your IP address with your session.
You don't have a login session on the server, because they abide by REST.
Now the above examples don't involve a web browser at all, but on the back end, the apps are communicating via HTTPS with their host servers. My point is that REST does not have to involve cookies and browsers etc. There are various means of storing client-side session state.
But lets talk about web browsers for a second, because that brings up another major advantage of REST that nobody here is talking about.
If the server tried to store session state, how is it supposed to identify each individual client?
It could not use their IP address, because many people could be using that same address on a shared router. So how, then?
It can't use MAC address for many reasons, not the least of which because you can be logged into multiple different Facebook accounts simultaneously on different browsers plus the app. One browser can easily pretend to be another one, and MAC addresses are just as easy to spoof.
If the server has to store some client-side state to identify you, it has to store it in RAM longer than just the time it takes to process your requests, or else it has to cache that data. Servers have limited amounts of RAM and cache, not to mention processor speed. Server-side state adds to all three, exponentially. Plus if the server is going to store any state about your sessions then it has to store it separately for each browser and app you're currently logged in with, and also for each different device you use.
So... I hope that you see now why REST is so important for scalability. I hope you can start to see why server-side session state is to server scalability what welded-on anvils are to car acceleration.
Where people get confused is by thinking that "state" refers to, like, information stored in a database. No, it refers to any information that needs to be in the RAM of the server when you're using it.