I\'m doing some simple web integration work which I\'m accomplishing through use of an iframe. My main window has some javascript which interacts with my server to redirect
There is a technique to disable the frame busting code, as discussed in a newer SO question:
As it turns out, your frame-busting code can be busted, as shown here:
<script type="text/javascript"> var prevent_bust = 0 window.onbeforeunload = function() { prevent_bust++ } setInterval(function() { if (prevent_bust > 0) { prevent_bust -= 2 window.top.location = 'http://server-which-responds-with-204.com' } }, 1) </script>
This code does the following:
- increments a counter every time the browser attempts to navigate away from the current page, via the
window.onbeforeonload
event handler- sets up a timer that fires every millisecond via
setInterval()
, and if it sees the counter incremented, changes the current location to a server of the attacker's control- that server serves up a page with HTTP status code 204, which does not cause the browser to navigate anywhere
After much searching I developed a simple trick. I created a dummy page in my own site which the i frame called for. I then had an i frame in the dummy page which called for the site breaking out of the frames. It broke out of the first frame, but since the dummy page was on my site it stayed neatly in the frame of the top page. violla
A valid question, and one I wish more people would take seriously, rather than just responding with lame comments about "respecting" the wishes of those whose material gets linked, sometimes unintentionally.
What about respecting the traffic, that frame busting javascript steals?
In netiquette terms framebusting scripts are actually a big no-no, for that very reason.
There are many genuine, and innocent reasons for using frames, or iframes, and it's not only very easy, but incredibly common, for code, especially url's, to be inserted either legitimately, or illegitimately, into a page within that frameset, that leads traffic intentionally or otherwise, to another page that rather rudely then breaks the frameset, and steal the traffic.
The correct netiquette approach for a webmaster to use, who doesn't wish for his material to be displayed in a frameset, whether it was done intentionally, or unintentionally, is to make a redirect script to a top page, that displays a message informing the surfer that the page requested was not intended to be viewed in frames, and should they wish to view that page then they can view it at an url, that is then linked, to open in a new tab, or browser page, which doesn't break the frameset, and steal the original sites traffic, thus allowing the surfer to make the choice themselves as to where they actually wish to surf.
I wish more webmasters would respect such netiquette.
This is my first post so don't trash me if it doesn't work, but this fix seems to work for me in IE. Add security="restricted" to your frame.
example:
<iframe id="frame_id" name="frame_name" security="restricted" src="page.html">
</iframe>
Edit: I found a better solution. That doesn't block scripts and doesn't require javascript. Try using sandbox="..."
Top navigation is what you want to prevent, so leave that out and it will not be allowed. Anything left out will be blocked
ex.
<iframe sandbox="allow-same-origin allow-scripts allow-popups allow-forms" src="http://www.example.com"></iframe>