Thread Safety in Javascript?

后端 未结 5 1366
无人及你
无人及你 2020-12-05 00:33

I have a function called save(), this function gathers up all the inputs on the page, and performs an AJAX call to the server to save the state of the user\'s work.

相关标签:
5条回答
  • 2020-12-05 00:44

    Looks safe to me. Javascript is single threaded (unless you are using webworkers)

    Its not quite on topic but this post by John Resig covers javascript threading and timers: http://ejohn.org/blog/how-javascript-timers-work/

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-05 00:58

    All the major browsers currently single-thread javascript execution (just don't use web workers since a few browsers support this technique!), so this approach is safe.

    For a bunch of references, see Is JavaScript Multithreaded?

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-05 01:04

    I think the way you're handling it is best for your situation. By using the flag you're guaranteeing that the asynchronous calls aren't overlapping. I've had to deal with asynchronous calls to the server as well and also used some sort of flag to prevent overlap.

    As others have already pointed out JavaScript is single threaded, but asynchronous calls can be tricky if you're expecting things to say the same or not happen during the round trip to the server.

    One thing, though, is that I don't think you actually need to disable the auto-save. If the auto-save tries to happen when a user is saving then the save method will simply return and nothing will happen. On the other hand you're needlessly disabling and reenabling the autosave every time autosave is activated. I'd recommend changing to setInterval and then forgetting about it.

    Also, I'm a stickler for minimizing global variables. I'd probably refactor your code like this:

    var saveWork = (function() {
      var isSaving=false;
      var timeoutId;
      var timeoutInterval=300000;
      function endSave() {  
          isSaving=false;
          //hides popup if it's visible
      }
      function endSaveError() {
         alert("Ooops");
         endSave();
      }
      function _save(showMsg) {
        //Don't save if we are already saving.
        if (isSaving)
        { 
         return;
        }
        isSaving=true;
    
        if (showMsg) { //show a saving popup}
        params=CollectParams();
        PerformCallBack(params,endSave,endSaveError);
      }
      return {
        save: function(showMsg) { _save(showMsg); },
        enableAutoSave: function() {
          timeoutId=setInterval(function(){_save(false);},timeoutInterval);
        },
        disableAutoSave: function() {
          cancelTimeOut(timeoutId);
        }
      };
    })();
    

    You don't have to refactor it like that, of course, but like I said, I like to minimize globals. The important thing is that the whole thing should work without disabling and reenabling autosave every time you save.

    Edit: Forgot had to create a private save function to be able to reference from enableAutoSave

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-05 01:05

    JavaScript in browsers is single threaded. You will only ever be in one function at any point in time. Functions will complete before the next one is entered. You can count on this behavior, so if you are in your save() function, you will never enter it again until the current one has finished.

    Where this sometimes gets confusing (and yet remains true) is when you have asynchronous server requests (or setTimeouts or setIntervals), because then it feels like your functions are being interleaved. They're not.

    In your case, while two save() calls will not overlap each other, your auto-save and user save could occur back-to-back.

    If you just want a save to happen at least every x seconds, you can do a setInterval on your save function and forget about it. I don't see a need for the isSaving flag.

    I think your code could be simplified a lot:

    var intervalTime = 300000;
    var intervalId = setInterval("save('my message')", intervalTime);
    function save(showMsg)
    {
      if (showMsg) { //show a saving popup}
      params=CollectParams();
      PerformCallBack(params, endSave, endSaveError);
    
      // You could even reset your interval now that you know we just saved.
      // Of course, you'll need to know it was a successful save.
      // Doing this will prevent the user clicking save only to have another
      // save bump them in the face right away because an interval comes up.
      clearInterval(intervalId);
      intervalId = setInterval("save('my message')", intervalTime);
    }
    
    function endSave()
    {
        // no need for this method
        alert("I'm done saving!");
    }
    
    function endSaveError()
    {
       alert("Ooops");
       endSave();
    }
    
    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-05 01:07

    All major browsers only support one javascript thread (unless you use web workers) on a page.

    XHR requests can be asynchronous, though. But as long as you disable the ability to save until the current request to save returns, everything should work out just fine.

    My only suggestion, is to make sure you indicate to the user somehow when an autosave occurs (disable the save button, etc).

    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题