Does Go\'s fmt.Printf
support outputting a number with the thousands comma?
fmt.Printf(\"%d\", 1000)
outputs 1000
, what format
Foreword: I released this utility with more customization in github.com/icza/gox, see fmtx.FormatInt().
The fmt package does not support grouping decimals.
We have to implement one ourselves (or use an existing one).
Here is a compact and really efficient solution (see explanation after):
Try it on the Go Playground.
func Format(n int64) string {
in := strconv.FormatInt(n, 10)
numOfDigits := len(in)
if n < 0 {
numOfDigits-- // First character is the - sign (not a digit)
}
numOfCommas := (numOfDigits - 1) / 3
out := make([]byte, len(in)+numOfCommas)
if n < 0 {
in, out[0] = in[1:], '-'
}
for i, j, k := len(in)-1, len(out)-1, 0; ; i, j = i-1, j-1 {
out[j] = in[i]
if i == 0 {
return string(out)
}
if k++; k == 3 {
j, k = j-1, 0
out[j] = ','
}
}
}
Testing it:
for _, v := range []int64{0, 1, 12, 123, 1234, 123456789} {
fmt.Printf("%10d = %12s\n", v, Format(v))
fmt.Printf("%10d = %12s\n", -v, Format(-v))
}
Output:
0 = 0
0 = 0
1 = 1
-1 = -1
12 = 12
-12 = -12
123 = 123
-123 = -123
1234 = 1,234
-1234 = -1,234
123456789 = 123,456,789
-123456789 = -123,456,789
Basically what the Format()
function does is it formats the number without grouping, then creates a big enough other slice and copies the digits of the number inserting comma (','
) grouping symbol when necessary (after groups of digits of 3 if there are more digits) meanwhile taking care of the negative sign to be preserved.
The length of the output:
It is basically the length of the input plus the number of grouping signs to be inserted. The number of grouping signs is:
numOfCommas = (numOfDigits - 1) / 3
Since the input string is a number which may only contain digits ('0..9'
) and optionally a negative sign ('-'
), the characters are simply mapped to bytes in a 1-to-1 fashion in UTF-8 encoding (this is how Go stores strings in memory). So we can simply work with bytes instead of runes. So the number of digits is the input string length, optionally minus 1
if the number is negative:
numOfDigits := len(in)
if n < 0 {
numOfDigits-- // First character is the - sign (not a digit)
}
And therefore the number of grouping signs:
numOfCommas := (numOfDigits - 1) / 3
Therefore the output slice will be:
out := make([]byte, len(in)+numOfCommas)
Handling the negative sign character:
If the number is negative, we simply slice the input string to exclude it from processing and we manually copy the sign bit to the output:
if n < 0 {
in, out[0] = in[1:], '-'
}
And therefore the rest of the function does not need to know/care about the optional negative sign character.
The rest of the function is a for
loop which just copies the bytes (digits) of the number from the input string to the output, inserting a grouping sign (','
) after every group of 3 digits if there are more digits. The loop goes downward so it's easier to track the groups of 3 digits. Once done (no more digits), the output byte slice is returned as a string
.
If you're less concerned with efficiency and more about readability, you might like this version:
func Format2(n int64) string {
if n < 0 {
return "-" + Format2(-n)
}
in := strconv.FormatInt(n, 10)
numOfCommas := (len(in) - 1) / 3
out := make([]byte, len(in)+numOfCommas)
for i, j, k := len(in)-1, len(out)-1, 0; ; i, j = i-1, j-1 {
out[j] = in[i]
if i == 0 {
return string(out)
}
if k++; k == 3 {
j, k = j-1, 0
out[j] = ','
}
}
}
Basically this handles negative numbers with a recursive call: if the number is negative, calls itself (recursive) with the absolute (positive) value and prepends the result with a "-"
string.
append()
slicesHere's another version using the builtin append() function and slice operations. Somewhat easier to understand but not so good performance-wise:
func Format3(n int64) string {
if n < 0 {
return "-" + Format3(-n)
}
in := []byte(strconv.FormatInt(n, 10))
var out []byte
if i := len(in) % 3; i != 0 {
if out, in = append(out, in[:i]...), in[i:]; len(in) > 0 {
out = append(out, ',')
}
}
for len(in) > 0 {
if out, in = append(out, in[:3]...), in[3:]; len(in) > 0 {
out = append(out, ',')
}
}
return string(out)
}
The first if
statement takes care of the first optional, "incomplete" group which is less than 3 digits if exists, and the subsequent for
loop handles the rest, copying 3 digits in each iteration and appending a comma (','
) grouping sign if there are more digits.
I wrote a library for this as well as a few other human-representation concerns.
Example results:
0 -> 0
100 -> 100
1000 -> 1,000
1000000000 -> 1,000,000,000
-100000 -> -100,000
Example Usage:
fmt.Printf("You owe $%s.\n", humanize.Comma(6582491))
None of the fmt print verbs support thousands separators.
I got interested in the performance of solutions offered in earlier answers and wrote tests with benchmarks for them, including two code snippets of mine. The following results were measured on MacBook 2018, i7 2.6GHz:
+---------------------+-------------------------------------------+--------------+
| Author | Description | Result |
|---------------------|-------------------------------------------|--------------|
| myself | dividing by 1,000 and appending groups | 3,472 ns/op |
| myself | inserting commas to digit groups | 2,662 ns/op |
| @icza | collecting digit by digit to output array | 1,695 ns/op |
| @dolmen | copying digit groups to output array | 1,797 ns/op |
| @Ivan Tung | writing digit by digit to buffer | 2,753 ns/op |
| @jchavannes | inserting commas using a regexp | 63,995 ns/op |
| @Steffi Keran Rani, | using github.com/dustin/go-humanize | 3,525 ns/op |
| @abourget, @Dustin | | |
| @dolmen | using golang.org/x/text/message | 12,511 ns/op |
+---------------------+-------------------------------------------+--------------+
Other hand-coded solutions are fast too and you will not regret choosing any of them, except for the usage of regexp. Using regexp needs the shortest code snippet, but the performance is so tragic, that it is not worth it.
My contribution to this topic, which you can try running in the playground:
func formatInt(number int) string {
output := strconv.Itoa(number)
startOffset := 3
if number < 0 {
startOffset++
}
for outputIndex := len(output); outputIndex > startOffset; {
outputIndex -= 3
output = output[:outputIndex] + "," + output[outputIndex:]
}
return output
}
You can also use this small package: https://github.com/floscodes/golang-thousands.
Just convert your number to a string an then use the Separate
-function like this:
n:="3478686" // your number as a string
thousands.Separate(n, "en") // adds thousands separators. the second argument sets the language mode.
Here is a function that takes an integer and grouping separator and returns a string delimited with the specified separator. I have tried to optimize for efficiency, no string concatenation or mod/division in the tight loop. From my profiling it is more than twice as fast as the humanize.Commas implementation (~680ns vs 1642ns) on my Mac. I am new to Go, would love to see faster implementations!
Usage: s := NumberToString(n int, sep rune)
Examples
Illustrates using different separator (',' vs ' '), verified with int value range.
s:= NumberToString(12345678, ',')
=> "12,345,678"
s:= NumberToString(12345678, ' ')
=> "12 345 678"
s: = NumberToString(-9223372036854775807, ',')
=> "-9,223,372,036,854,775,807"
Function Implementation
func NumberToString(n int, sep rune) string {
s := strconv.Itoa(n)
startOffset := 0
var buff bytes.Buffer
if n < 0 {
startOffset = 1
buff.WriteByte('-')
}
l := len(s)
commaIndex := 3 - ((l - startOffset) % 3)
if (commaIndex == 3) {
commaIndex = 0
}
for i := startOffset; i < l; i++ {
if (commaIndex == 3) {
buff.WriteRune(sep)
commaIndex = 0
}
commaIndex++
buff.WriteByte(s[i])
}
return buff.String()
}