I\'m building a simple helper script for work that will copy a couple of template files in our code base to the current directory. I don\'t, however, have the absolute path
Instead of using
import os
dirname = os.path.dirname(__file__)
filename = os.path.join(dirname, 'relative/path/to/file/you/want')
as in the accepted answer, it would be more robust to use:
import inspect
import os
dirname = os.path.dirname(os.path.abspath(inspect.stack()[0][1]))
filename = os.path.join(dirname, 'relative/path/to/file/you/want')
because using __file__ will return the file from which the module was loaded, if it was loaded from a file, so if the file with the script is called from elsewhere, the directory returned will not be correct.
These answers give more detail: https://stackoverflow.com/a/31867043/5542253 and https://stackoverflow.com/a/50502/5542253
As mentioned in the accepted answer
import os
dir = os.path.dirname(__file__)
filename = os.path.join(dir, '/relative/path/to/file/you/want')
I just want to add that
the latter string can't begin with the backslash , infact no string should include a backslash
It should be something like
import os
dir = os.path.dirname(__file__)
filename = os.path.join(dir, 'relative','path','to','file','you','want')
The accepted answer can be misleading in some cases , please refer to this link for details
I'm not sure if this applies to some of the older versions, but I believe Python 3.3 has native relative path support.
For example the following code should create a text file in the same folder as the python script:
open("text_file_name.txt", "w+t")
(note that there shouldn't be a forward or backslash at the beginning if it's a relative path)