I have a list of items that I\'m trying to arrange into a scrollable horizontal layout with flexbox.
Each item in the container has a margin left and right, but the
You can set width
and overflow
on the div
container, and set display: inline-flex
rather than flex
on the ul
, so that the size of the flex box will be calculated based on the items inside, and all padding and margin will apply without any issues.
.container {
width: 600px;
overflow: auto;
}
.container ul {
list-style: none;
padding: 0;
margin: 0;
display: inline-flex;
background: orange;
}
.container li {
padding: 60px;
margin: 0 30px;
white-space: nowrap;
background: blue;
color: #fff;
}
<div class="container">
<ul>
<li>Item 1</li>
<li>Item 2</li>
<li>Item 3</li>
<li>Item 4</li>
</ul>
</div>
The last margin is not being collapsed. It's being ignored.
The overflow
property applies only to content. It doesn't apply to padding or margins.
Here's what it says in the spec:
11.1.1 Overflow: the overflow property
This property specifies whether content of a block container element is clipped when it overflows the element's box.
Now let's take a look at the CSS Box Model:
source: W3C
The overflow
property is limited to the content box area. If the content overflows its container, then overflow
applies. But overflow
doesn't enter into the padding or margin areas (unless, of course, there is more content that follows).
The problem with Potential Problem #1 is that it appears to fall apart outside of a flex or grid formatting context. For example, in a standard block layout, the last margin doesn't appear to collapse. So maybe overflow
is permitted to cover margins / paddings, regardless of what it says in the spec.
div {
height: 150px;
overflow: auto;
width: 600px;
background: orange;
white-space: nowrap;
}
span {
background: blue;
color: #fff;
padding: 50px;
margin: 0 30px;
display: inline-block;
}
<div class="container">
<span>Item 1</span>
<span>Item 2</span>
<span>Item 3</span>
<span>Item 4</span>
</div>
Hence, maybe the problem is instead related to elements that are "over-constrained".
10.3.3 Block-level, non-replaced elements in normal flow
The following constraints must hold among the used values of the other properties:
margin-left
+border-left-width
+padding-left
+width
+padding-right
+border-right-width
+margin-right
= width of containing blockIf
width
is notauto
andborder-left-width
+padding-left
+width
+padding-right
+border-right-width
(plus any ofmargin-left
ormargin-right
that are notauto
) is larger than the width of the containing block, then anyauto
values formargin-left
ormargin-right
are, for the following rules, treated as zero.If all of the above have a computed value other than
auto
, the values are said to be "over-constrained" and one of the used values will have to be different from its computed value. If thedirection
property of the containing block has the valueltr
, the specified value ofmargin-right
is ignored and the value is calculated so as to make the equality true. If the value ofdirection
isrtl
, this happens tomargin-left
instead(emphasis added)
So, according to the CSS Visual Formatting Model, elements may be "over-constrained" and, as a result, a right margin gets tossed out.
Instead of margin or padding, use a right border on the last element:
li:last-child {
border-right: 30px solid orange;
}
ul {
list-style-type: none;
padding: 0;
margin: 0;
display: flex;
height: 100px; /* adjusted for demo */
overflow: auto;
width: 600px;
background: orange;
}
ul li {
background: blue;
color: #fff;
padding: 90px;
margin: 0 30px;
white-space: nowrap;
flex-basis: auto;
}
li:last-child {
border-right: 30px solid orange;
}
<ul>
<li>Item 1</li>
<li>Item 2</li>
<li>Item 3</li>
<li>Item 4</li>
</ul>
Another solution uses a pseudo-elements instead of margins or padding.
Pseudo-elements on a flex container are rendered as flex items. The first item in the container is ::before
and last item is ::after
.
ul::after {
content: "";
flex: 0 0 30px;
}
ul {
list-style-type: none;
padding: 0;
margin: 0;
display: flex;
height: 100px; /* adjusted for demo */
overflow: auto;
width: 600px;
background: orange;
}
ul li {
margin: 0 30px;
background: blue;
color: #fff;
padding: 90px;
white-space: nowrap;
flex-basis: auto;
}
ul::after {
content: "";
flex: 0 0 30px;
}
ul::before {
content: "";
flex: 0 0 30px;
}
<ul>
<li>Item 1</li>
<li>Item 2</li>
<li>Item 3</li>
<li>Item 4</li>
</ul>
Your problem is not the margin in itself. It's the scroll bar dimensioning only the visible content of the element.
One hack to solve it would be to create a visible element that occupies the margin
This solution handles this using a pseudo on the last child
ul {
list-style-type: none;
padding: 0;
margin: 0;
display: flex;
height: 300px;
overflow: auto;
width: 600px;
background: orange;
}
ul li {
background: blue;
color: #fff;
padding: 90px;
margin: 0 30px;
white-space: nowrap;
flex-basis: auto;
position: relative;
}
li:last-child:after {
content: "";
width: 30px;
height: 1px;
position: absolute;
left: 100%;
top: 0px;
}
<div class"container">
<ul>
<li>Item 1</li>
<li>Item 2</li>
<li>Item 3</li>
<li>Item 4</li>
</ul>
</div>
See the solution. I remove white-space
, flex-basis
and margin
, to provide you a pure flexbox solution.
It relays on flex-flow: row
(horizontal), justify-content: space-around
(your margin) and no more!! The width
is changed to 1200px
since the padding of 90px set the total width of the boxes more than your 600px (defined in your snippet).
ul {
list-style-type: none;
padding: 0;
margin: 0;
display: flex;
flex-flow: row ;
justify-content: space-around;
height: 300px;
overflow: auto;
width: 1200px;
background: orange;
}
ul li {
background: blue;
color: #fff;
padding: 90px;
}
<div class"container">
<ul>
<li>Item 1</li>
<li>Item 2</li>
<li>Item 3</li>
<li>Item 4</li>
</ul>
</div>