I need to emulate a do-while loop in a Python program. Unfortunately, the following straightforward code does not work:
list_of_ints = [ 1, 2, 3 ]
iterator =
The way I've done this is as follows...
condition = True
while condition:
do_stuff()
condition = (<something that evaluates to True or False>)
This seems to me to be the simplistic solution, I'm surprised I haven't seen it here already. This can obviously also be inverted to
while not condition:
etc.
If you're in a scenario where you are looping while a resource is unavaliable or something similar that throws an exception, you could use something like
import time
while True:
try:
f = open('some/path', 'r')
except IOError:
print('File could not be read. Retrying in 5 seconds')
time.sleep(5)
else:
break
For me a typical while loop will be something like this:
xBool = True
# A counter to force a condition (eg. yCount = some integer value)
while xBool:
# set up the condition (eg. if yCount > 0):
(Do something)
yCount = yCount - 1
else:
# (condition is not met, set xBool False)
xBool = False
I could include a for..loop within the while loop as well, if situation so warrants, for looping through another set of condition.
I am not sure what you are trying to do. You can implement a do-while loop like this:
while True:
stuff()
if fail_condition:
break
Or:
stuff()
while not fail_condition:
stuff()
What are you doing trying to use a do while loop to print the stuff in the list? Why not just use:
for i in l:
print i
print "done"
Update:
So do you have a list of lines? And you want to keep iterating through it? How about:
for s in l:
while True:
stuff()
# use a "break" instead of s = i.next()
Does that seem like something close to what you would want? With your code example, it would be:
for s in some_list:
while True:
if state is STATE_CODE:
if "//" in s:
tokens.add( TOKEN_COMMENT, s.split( "//" )[1] )
state = STATE_COMMENT
else :
tokens.add( TOKEN_CODE, s )
if state is STATE_COMMENT:
if "//" in s:
tokens.append( TOKEN_COMMENT, s.split( "//" )[1] )
break # get next s
else:
state = STATE_CODE
# re-evaluate same line
# continues automatically
do {
stuff()
} while (condition())
->
while True:
stuff()
if not condition():
break
You can do a function:
def do_while(stuff, condition):
while condition(stuff()):
pass
But 1) It's ugly. 2) Condition should be a function with one parameter, supposed to be filled by stuff (it's the only reason not to use the classic while loop.)
Here is a crazier solution of a different pattern -- using coroutines. The code is still very similar, but with one important difference; there are no exit conditions at all! The coroutine (chain of coroutines really) just stops when you stop feeding it with data.
def coroutine(func):
"""Coroutine decorator
Coroutines must be started, advanced to their first "yield" point,
and this decorator does this automatically.
"""
def startcr(*ar, **kw):
cr = func(*ar, **kw)
cr.next()
return cr
return startcr
@coroutine
def collector(storage):
"""Act as "sink" and collect all sent in @storage"""
while True:
storage.append((yield))
@coroutine
def state_machine(sink):
""" .send() new parts to be tokenized by the state machine,
tokens are passed on to @sink
"""
s = ""
state = STATE_CODE
while True:
if state is STATE_CODE :
if "//" in s :
sink.send((TOKEN_COMMENT, s.split( "//" )[1] ))
state = STATE_COMMENT
else :
sink.send(( TOKEN_CODE, s ))
if state is STATE_COMMENT :
if "//" in s :
sink.send(( TOKEN_COMMENT, s.split( "//" )[1] ))
else
state = STATE_CODE
# re-evaluate same line
continue
s = (yield)
tokens = []
sm = state_machine(collector(tokens))
for piece in i:
sm.send(piece)
The code above collects all tokens as tuples in tokens
and I assume there is no difference between .append()
and .add()
in the original code.