Connection pooling options with JDBC: DBCP vs C3P0

前端 未结 16 1848
遥遥无期
遥遥无期 2020-11-22 06:17

What is the best connection pooling library available for Java/JDBC?

I\'m considering the 2 main candidates (free / open-source):

  • Apache DBCP - http:/
相关标签:
16条回答
  • 2020-11-22 06:50

    Here are some articles that show that DBCP has significantly higher performance than C3P0 or Proxool. Also in my own experience c3p0 does have some nice features, like prepared statement pooling and is more configurable than DBCP, but DBCP is plainly faster in any environment I have used it in.

    Difference between dbcp and c3p0? Absolutely nothing! (A Sakai developers blog) http://blogs.nyu.edu/blogs/nrm216/sakaidelic/2007/12/difference_between_dbcp_and_c3.html

    See also the like to the JavaTech article "Connection Pool Showdown" in the comments on the blog post.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-11-22 06:50

    To Implement the C3P0 in best way then check this answer

    C3P0:

    For enterprise application, C3P0 is best approach. C3P0 is an easy-to-use library for augmenting traditional (DriverManager-based) JDBC drivers with JNDI-bindable DataSources, including DataSources that implement Connection and Statement Pooling, as described by the jdbc3 spec and jdbc2 std extension. C3P0 also robustly handled DB disconnects and transparent reconnects on resume whereas DBCP never recovered connections if the link was taken out from beneath it.

    So this is why c3p0 and other connection pools also have prepared statement caches- it allows application code to avoid dealing with all this. The statements are usually kept in some limited LRU pool, so common statements reuse a PreparedStatement instance.

    Worse still DBCP was returning Connection objects to the application for which the underlying transport had broken. A common use case for c3p0 is to replace the standard DBCP connection pooling included with Apache Tomcat. Often times, a programmer will run into a situation where connections are not correctly recycled in the DBCP connection pool and c3p0 is a valuable replacement in this case.

    In current updates C3P0 has some brilliant features. those are given bellow:

    ComboPooledDataSource dataSource = new ComboPooledDataSource();
    dataSource.setMinPoolSize();
    dataSource.setMaxPoolSize();
    dataSource.setMaxIdleTime();
    dataSource.setMaxStatements();
    dataSource.setMaxStatementsPerConnection();
    dataSource.setMaxIdleTimeExcessConnections();
    

    Here, max and min poolsize define bounds of connection that means how minimum and maximum connection this application will take. MaxIdleTime() define when it will release the idle connection.

    DBCP:

    This approach is also good but have some drawbacks like connection timeout and connection realeasing. C3P0 is good when we are using mutithreading projects. In our projects we used simultaneously multiple thread executions by using DBCP, then we got connection timeout if we used more thread executions. So we went with c3p0 configuration. I would not recommend DBCP at all, especially it's knack of throwing connections out of the pool when the DB goes away, its inability to reconnect when the DB comes back and its inability to dynamically add connection objects back into the pool (it hangs forever on a post JDBCconnect I/O socket read)

    Thanks :)

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-11-22 06:51

    I invite you to try out BoneCP -- it's free, open source, and faster than the available alternatives (see benchmark section).

    Disclaimer: I'm the author so you could say I'm biased :-)

    UPDATE: As of March 2010, still around 35% faster than the new rewritten Apache DBCP ("tomcat jdbc") pool. See dynamic benchmark link in benchmark section.

    Update #2: (Dec '13) After 4 years at the top, there's now a much faster competitor : https://github.com/brettwooldridge/HikariCP

    Update #3: (Sep '14) Please consider BoneCP to be deprecated at this point, recommend switching to HikariCP.

    Update #4: (April '15) -- I no longer own the domain jolbox.com

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-11-22 06:51

    Just got done wasting a day and a half with DBCP. Even though I'm using the latest DBCP release, I ran into exactly the same problems as j pimmel did. I would not recommend DBCP at all, especially it's knack of throwing connections out of the pool when the DB goes away, its inability to reconnect when the DB comes back and its inability to dynamically add connection objects back into the pool (it hangs forever on a post JDBCconnect I/O socket read)

    I'm switching over to C3P0 now. I've used that in previous projects and it worked and performed like a charm.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-11-22 06:51

    my recommendation is

    hikari > druid > UCP > c3p0 > DBCP

    It's based on what I have tested - 20190202, in my local test environment(4GB mac/mysql in docker/pool minSize=1, maxSize=8), hikari can serve 1024 threads x 1024 times to get connections, average time for each thread to finish is 1 or 2 million seconds, while c3p0 can only serve 256 threads x 1024 times and average time for each thread is already 21 million seconds. (512 threads failed).

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-11-22 06:52

    Have been using DBCP for a couple of years now in production. It is stable, survives DB server reboot. Just configure it properly. It only requires a handful of parameters to be specified so don't be lazy. Here is a snippet from our system production code which lists parameters that we explicitly set to make it work:

    DriverAdapterCPDS driverAdapterCPDS = new DriverAdapterCPDS();
    driverAdapterCPDS.setUrl(dataSourceProperties.getProperty("url"));
    driverAdapterCPDS.setUser(dataSourceProperties.getProperty("username"));
    driverAdapterCPDS.setPassword(dataSourceProperties.getProperty("password"));
    driverAdapterCPDS.setDriver(dataSourceProperties.getProperty("driverClass"));
    
    driverAdapterCPDS.setMaxActive(Integer.valueOf(dataSourceProperties.getProperty("maxActive")));
    driverAdapterCPDS.setMaxIdle(Integer.valueOf(dataSourceProperties.getProperty("maxIdle")));
    driverAdapterCPDS.setPoolPreparedStatements(Boolean.valueOf(dataSourceProperties.getProperty("poolPreparedStatements")));
    
    SharedPoolDataSource poolDataSource = new SharedPoolDataSource();
    poolDataSource.setConnectionPoolDataSource(driverAdapterCPDS);
    poolDataSource.setMaxWait(Integer.valueOf(dataSourceProperties.getProperty("maxWait")));
    poolDataSource.setDefaultTransactionIsolation(Integer.valueOf(dataSourceProperties.getProperty("defaultTransactionIsolation")));
    poolDataSource.setDefaultReadOnly(Boolean.valueOf(dataSourceProperties.getProperty("defaultReadOnly")));
    poolDataSource.setTestOnBorrow(Boolean.valueOf(dataSourceProperties.getProperty("testOnBorrow")));
    poolDataSource.setValidationQuery("SELECT 0");
    
    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题