Is there any difference between using the @PostConstruct
annotation and declaring the same method as init-method
in Spring XML configuration?
@postconstruct is not part of the spring. It is part of javax package. Both are the same. using init-method we need to added in xml file.If you use @postconstruct adding in xml is not required. Check out the below article .
http://answersz.com/spring-postconstruct-and-predestroy/
As you can see in the below diagram of Bean Creation Life-Cycle Callback.
This 3 step happens in the Bean Creation Life-Cycle Callback:
@PostConstruct
will be called.InitializingBean
is implemented, then afterPropertiesSet()
will be called.init-method
or @Bean(initmethod="..")
then it calls the init method.This diagram is from Pro Spring 5: An In-Depth Guide to the Spring Framework and Its Tools
There might be difference between @PostConstruct
and init-method
because @PostConstruct
is handled in the postProcessAfterInitialization
phase of bean initialization (AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.initializeBean()
method) by CommonAnnotationBeanPostProcessor
, while init
method gets called after the completion of postProcessBeforeInitialization
phase (and, for this matter, before the beginning of postProcessAfterInitialization
phase).
EDIT:
So, the sequence is:
1) postProcessBeforeInitialization
phase,
2) init
method gets called,
3) postProcessAfterInitialization
phase, which calls @PostConstruct
method
(As a side note, a statement from the accepted answer
@PostConstruct, init-method are BeanPostProcessors
is not quite correct: @PostConstruct
is handled by a BeanPostProcessor
, init
method is not.)
There will be difference if some (potentially custom) BeanPostProcessor
, which is configured with (Ordered.getOrder()
) to be executed after CommonAnnotationBeanPostProcessor
, is doing something serious in its postProcessBeforeInitialization
method.
There is no any difference with the default Spring configuration of BeanPostProcessors
because all the BeanPostProcessors
which are configured to be executed after CommonAnnotationBeanPostProcessor
, don't do anything in postProcessBeforeInitialization
method.
In conclusion, the accepted answer and the similar are right ... in 99% of the cases, and this post is just to pay a tribute to a concept "devil is in the details"
Full code here: https://github.com/wkaczurba/so8519187 (spring-boot)
Using annotations:
@Slf4j
@Component
public class MyComponent implements InitializingBean {
@Value("${mycomponent.value:Magic}")
public String value;
public MyComponent() {
log.info("MyComponent in constructor: [{}]", value); // (0) displays: Null
}
@PostConstruct
public void postConstruct() {
log.info("MyComponent in postConstruct: [{}]", value); // (1) displays: Magic
}
@Override // init-method; overrides InitializingBean.afterPropertiesSet()
public void afterPropertiesSet() {
log.info("MyComponent in afterPropertiesSet: [{}]", value); // (2) displays: Magic
}
@PreDestroy
public void preDestroy() {
log.info("MyComponent in preDestroy: [{}]", value); // (3) displays: Magic
}
}
Gets us:
Refreshing org.springframework.context...
MyComponent in constructor: [null]
MyComponent in postConstruct: [Magic]
MyComponent in afterPropertiesSet: [Magic]
...
Registering beans for JMX exposure on startup
Started DemoApplication in 0.561 seconds (JVM running for 1.011)
Closing org.springframework.context... Unregistering JMX-exposed beans on shutdown
...
MyComponent in preDestroy: [Magic]
No practically I don't think there is any difference but there are priorities in the way they work. @PostConstruct
, init-method
are BeanPostProcessors.
@PostConstruct
is a JSR-250 annotation while init-method
is Spring's way of having an initializing method.@PostConstruct
method, this will be called first before the initializing methods are called.afterPropertiesSet
, first @PostConstruct
is called, then the afterPropertiesSet
and then init-method
.For more info you can check Spring's reference documentation.
Before JSR 250 specs , usage of init-method in xml was preferred way , as it decouples java classes (beans) from any spring specific classes/annotations.So if you are building a library that does not need to be dependent on spring infrastructure beans then use of init-method was preferred.During creation method u can specify the method that needs to be called as initialization method.
Now with introduction of JSR 250 specs in Java EE and spring support of these annotations , dependency on spring framework has been reduced to a certain extent.
But i have to admit that addition of these things increase the readability of code.So there are pros and cons both approaches.
There's no real difference. It's down to how you prefer to configure your system, and that's a matter of personal choice. Myself, I prefer to use @PostConstruct
annotations for my own code (as the bean is only correctly configured after the method is called) and I use init-method
when instantiating beans from non-Spring-aware libraries (can't apply annotations there, of course!) but I can totally understand people wanting to do it all one way or the other.