I wanted to use the var
keyword to declare a field in my class however var
only seems to work inside methods.
The code I have looks like:
The short answer is because the spec says it's not legal. ;-)
Generally, this is not what you want to do anyway. The type of the member should be IDictionary<string, string>
not Dictionary<string, string>
. It's a small nit but generally it's better to use an interface in an externally visible object so you can change the type later without affecting the clients of the code. The compiler is just giving you a little nudge to guide you that direction.
My article on the subject:
Why no var on fields?
To summarize:
If we have "var" fields then the type of the field cannot be determined until the expression is analyzed, and that happens after we already need to know the type of the field.
What if there are long chains, or even cycles in those references? All of those algorithms would have to be rewritten and tested in a world where top-level type information is being determined from them rather than being consumed by them.
If you have "var" fields then the initializer could be of anonymous type. Suppose the field is public. There is not yet any standard in the CLR or the CLS about what the right way to expose a field of anonymous type is.
From the C# reference
Also from The C# Programming Reference
It just isn't intended for the usage you have in mind.
It's primary aim is to allow the support of anonymous types in your code, with the added advantage of allowing a nice terse way of specifying local variables.