How do I work with dynamic multi-dimensional arrays in C?

Question

Does someone know how I can use dynamically allocated multi-dimensional arrays using C? Is that possible?

Answer 1

malloc will do.

 int rows = 20;
 int cols = 20;
 int *array;

  array = malloc(rows * cols * sizeof(int));

Refer the below article for help:-

http://courses.cs.vt.edu/~cs2704/spring00/mcquain/Notes/4up/Managing2DArrays.pdf

Answer 2

With dynamic allocation, using malloc:

int** x;

x = malloc(dimension1_max * sizeof(*x));
for (int i = 0; i < dimension1_max; i++) {
  x[i] = malloc(dimension2_max * sizeof(x[0]));
}

//Writing values
x[0..(dimension1_max-1)][0..(dimension2_max-1)] = Value; 
[...]

for (int i = 0; i < dimension1_max; i++) {
  free(x[i]);
}
free(x);

This allocates an 2D array of size dimension1_max * dimension2_max. So, for example, if you want a 640*480 array (f.e. pixels of an image), use dimension1_max = 640, dimension2_max = 480. You can then access the array using x[d1][d2] where d1 = 0..639, d2 = 0..479.

But a search on SO or Google also reveals other possibilities, for example in this SO question

Note that your array won't allocate a contiguous region of memory (640*480 bytes) in that case which could give problems with functions that assume this. So to get the array satisfy the condition, replace the malloc block above with this:

int** x;
int* temp;

x = malloc(dimension1_max * sizeof(*x));
temp = malloc(dimension1_max * dimension2_max * sizeof(x[0]));
for (int i = 0; i < dimension1_max; i++) {
  x[i] = temp + (i * dimension2_max);
}

[...]

free(temp);
free(x);

Answer 3

// use new instead of malloc as using malloc leads to memory leaks `enter code here

    int **adj_list = new int*[rowsize];       
    for(int i = 0; i < rowsize; ++i)    
    {

        adj_list[i] = new int[colsize];

    }

Answer 4

Here is working code that defines a subroutine make_3d_array to allocate a multidimensional 3D array with N1, N2 and N3 elements in each dimension, and then populates it with random numbers. You can use the notation A[i][j][k] to access its elements.

#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <time.h>


// Method to allocate a 2D array of floats
float*** make_3d_array(int nx, int ny, int nz) {
    float*** arr;
    int i,j;

    arr = (float ***) malloc(nx*sizeof(float**));

    for (i = 0; i < nx; i++) {
        arr[i] = (float **) malloc(ny*sizeof(float*));

        for(j = 0; j < ny; j++) {
            arr[i][j] = (float *) malloc(nz * sizeof(float));
        }
    }

    return arr;
} 



int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
    int i, j, k;
    size_t N1=10,N2=20,N3=5;

    // allocates 3D array
    float ***ran = make_3d_array(N1, N2, N3);

    // initialize pseudo-random number generator
    srand(time(NULL)); 

    // populates the array with random numbers
    for (i = 0; i < N1; i++){
        for (j=0; j<N2; j++) {
            for (k=0; k<N3; k++) {
                ran[i][j][k] = ((float)rand()/(float)(RAND_MAX));
            }
        }
   }

    // prints values
    for (i=0; i<N1; i++) {
        for (j=0; j<N2; j++) {
            for (k=0; k<N3; k++) {
                printf("A[%d][%d][%d] = %f \n", i,j,k,ran[i][j][k]);
            }
        }
    }

    free(ran);
}

Answer 5

If you know the number of columns at compile time, it's pretty simple:

#define COLS ...
...
size_t rows;
// get number of rows
T (*ap)[COLS] = malloc(sizeof *ap * rows); // ap is a *pointer to an array* of T

You can treat ap like any 2D array:

ap[i][j] = x;

When you're done you deallocate it as

free(ap);

If you don't know the number of columns at compile time, but you're working with a C99 compiler or a C2011 compiler that supports variable-length arrays, it's still pretty simple:

size_t rows;
size_t cols;
// get rows and cols
T (*ap)[cols] = malloc(sizeof *ap * rows);
...
ap[i][j] = x;
...
free(ap);

If you don't know the number of columns at compile time and you're working with a version of C that doesn't support variable-length arrays, then you'll need to do something different. If you need all of the elements to be allocated in a contiguous chunk (like a regular array), then you can allocate the memory as a 1D array, and compute a 1D offset:

size_t rows, cols;
// get rows and columns
T *ap = malloc(sizeof *ap * rows * cols);
...
ap[i * rows + j] = x;
...
free(ap);

If you don't need the memory to be contiguous, you can follow a two-step allocation method:

size_t rows, cols;
// get rows and cols
T **ap = malloc(sizeof *ap * rows);
if (ap)
{
  size_t i = 0;
  for (i = 0; i < cols; i++)
  {
    ap[i] = malloc(sizeof *ap[i] * cols);
  }
}

ap[i][j] = x;

Since allocation was a two-step process, deallocation also needs to be a two-step process:

for (i = 0; i < cols; i++)
  free(ap[i]);
free(ap);

Answer 6

Basics

Arrays in c are declared and accessed using the [] operator. So that

int ary1[5];

declares an array of 5 integers. Elements are numbered from zero so ary1[0] is the first element, and ary1[4] is the last element. Note1: There is no default initialization, so the memory occupied by the array may initially contain anything. Note2: ary1[5] accesses memory in an undefined state (which may not even be accessible to you), so don't do it!

Multi-dimensional arrays are implemented as an array of arrays (of arrays (of ... ) ). So

float ary2[3][5];

declares an array of 3 one-dimensional arrays of 5 floating point numbers each. Now ary2[0][0] is the first element of the first array, ary2[0][4] is the last element of the first array, and ary2[2][4] is the last element of the last array. The '89 standard requires this data to be contiguous (sec. A8.6.2 on page 216 of my K&R 2nd. ed.) but seems to be agnostic on padding.

Trying to go dynamic in more than one dimension

If you don't know the size of the array at compile time, you'll want to dynamically allocate the array. It is tempting to try

double *buf3;
buf3 = malloc(3*5*sizeof(double));
/* error checking goes here */

which should work if the compiler does not pad the allocation (stick extra space between the one-dimensional arrays). It might be safer to go with:

double *buf4;
buf4 = malloc(sizeof(double[3][5]));
/* error checking */

but either way the trick comes at dereferencing time. You can't write buf[i][j] because buf has the wrong type. Nor can you use

double **hdl4 = (double**)buf;
hdl4[2][3] = 0; /* Wrong! */

because the compiler expects hdl4 to be the address of an address of a double. Nor can you use double incomplete_ary4[][]; because this is an error;

So what can you do?

• Do the row and column arithmetic yourself
• Allocate and do the work in a function
• Use an array of pointers (the mechanism qrdl is talking about)

Do the math yourself

Simply compute memory offset to each element like this:

  for (i=0; i<3; ++i){
     for(j=0; j<3; ++j){
        buf3[i * 5 + j] = someValue(i,j); /* Don't need to worry about 
                                             padding in this case */
     }
  }

Allocate and do the work in a function

Define a function that takes the needed size as an argument and proceed as normal

void dary(int x, int y){
  double ary4[x][y];
  ary4[2][3] = 5;
}

Of course, in this case ary4 is a local variable and you can not return it: all the work with the array must be done in the function you call of in functions that it calls.

An array of pointers

Consider this:

double **hdl5 = malloc(3*sizeof(double*));
/* Error checking */
for (i=0; i<3; ++i){
   hdl5[i] = malloc(5*sizeof(double))
   /* Error checking */
}

Now hdl5 points to an array of pointers each of which points to an array of doubles. The cool bit is that you can use the two-dimensional array notation to access this structure---hdl5[0][2] gets the middle element of the first row---but this is none-the-less a different kind of object than a two-dimensional array declared by double ary[3][5];.

This structure is more flexible then a two dimensional array (because the rows need not be the same length), but accessing it will generally be slower and it requires more memory (you need a place to hold the intermediate pointers).

Note that since I haven't setup any guards you'll have to keep track of the size of all the arrays yourself.

Arithmetic

c provides no support for vector, matrix or tensor math, you'll have to implement it yourself, or bring in a library.

Multiplication by a scaler and addition and subtraction of arrays of the same rank are easy: just loop over the elements and perform the operation as you go. Inner products are similarly straight forward.

Outer products mean more loops.