Why does time(time_t *) function both return and set the by-ref?

前端 未结 2 474
傲寒
傲寒 2020-12-03 13:40

I\'ve always been curious, why does the time(time_t *) function both return a time_t, and set the time to the passed in pointer?

Example of

相关标签:
2条回答
  • 2020-12-03 14:21

    There's no real benefit in the way it's currently defined.

    I suspect that when the time() function was first defined, it used a type that could not be returned from a function. Very early C implementations didn't have long int and were not able to return structures from functions. On a system with 16-bit ints, the only way to represent a time would be as a structure or as an array; 16 bits worth of seconds is less than a day.

    UPDATE: My speculation is confirmed, see below.

    So early implementations of time() might have been used something like this (speculation):

    time_t now;
    time(&now);    /* sets now.time_high, now.time_low */
    

    or perhaps:

    int now[2];
    time_t(now);    /* sets now[0], now[1] */
    

    When later C implementations added longer integers and the ability to return structures by value, the ability to return a time_t value from the time() function was added, but the old functionality was kept to avoid breaking existing code.

    I think that if time() were being defined today, it would look more like this:

    time_t time(void);
    

    I haven't been able to confirm that old implementations of the time() function worked this way (try Googling "time"!), but it makes sense given the history of the language.

    If you pass a null pointer to the time() function, it returns the current time without also storing it in a variable; this avoids some of the performance penalty:

    time_t now = time(NULL);
    

    UPDATE

    Early UNIX sources are available in https://github.com/dspinellis/unix-history-repo

    Checking out the Research-V6 git tag, the man page for the time() system call is in usr/doc/man/man2/time.2. It's written in an obsolete form of *roff, but here's my attempt at formatting it. (The implementation, written in PDP-11 assembly and callable from C, is in usr/source/s2/time.s.)

    C didn't have void functions at that time. Functions without a declared return type would return int by default. It's not clear to me what the time function would return, but my guess is that it would be the high-order 16-bit word of the 32-bit value. As of the date on the man page, that would have been about 1730, in units of 216 seconds (18h12m16s). Correctly written C code would not have attempted to use the return value.

    TIME 8/5/73

    NAME

    time - get date and time

    SYNOPSIS

    (time = 13.)
    sys time
    
    time(tvec)
    int tvec[2]
    

    DESCRIPTION

    Time returns returns the time since 00:00:00 GMT, Jan. 1, 1970, measured in seconds. From as, the high order word is in the r0 register and the low order is in r1. From C, the user-supplied vector is filled in.

    SEE ALSO

    date (I), stime (II), ctime (III)

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-03 14:22

    It allows you to nest a call to time() within another expression, instead of doing it in a separate statement:

    time_t x = time(&now) + more_time;
    

    When the above statement finishes, now should contain the current time, and x should contain the current time plus some value.

    strcpy falls in the same case because it returns the same char * pointer that has been passed as its destination, so nesting it is possible as well:

    printf("Copied string is %s", strcpy(dst, src));
    
    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题