with open(\"hello.txt\", \"wb\") as f: f.write(\"Hello Python!\\n\")
seems to be the same as
f = open(\"hello.txt\", \"wb\")
f.write(\"Hell
In order to be equivalent to the with
statement version, the code you wrote should look instead like this:
f = open("hello.txt", "wb")
try:
f.write("Hello Python!\n")
finally:
f.close()
While this might seem like syntactic sugar, it ensures that you release resources. Generally the world is more complex than these contrived examples and if you forget a try.. except...
or fail to handle an extreme case, you have resource leaks on your hands.
The with
statement saves you from those leaks, making it easier to write clean code. For a complete explanation, look at PEP 343, it has plenty of examples.
The former still closes f
if an exception occurs during the f.write()
.
If f.write
throws an exception, f.close()
is called when you use with
and not called in the second case. Also f
has a smaller scope and the code is cleaner when using with.