I\'m trying to write a regular expression that validates a date. The regex needs to match the following
This is not an appropriate use of regular expressions. You'd be better off using
[0-9]{2}/[0-9]{2}/[0-9]{4}
and then checking ranges in a higher-level language.
Sounds like you're overextending regex for this purpose. What I would do is use a regex to match a few date formats and then use a separate function to validate the values of the date fields so extracted.
var dtRegex = new RegExp(/[1-9\-]{4}[0-9\-]{2}[0-9\-]{2}/);
if(dtRegex.test(date) == true){
var evalDate = date.split('-');
if(evalDate[0] != '0000' && evalDate[1] != '00' && evalDate[2] != '00'){
return true;
}
}
Regex was not meant to validate number ranges(this number must be from 1 to 5 when the number preceding it happens to be a 2 and the number preceding that happens to be below 6). Just look for the pattern of placement of numbers in regex. If you need to validate is qualities of a date, put it in a date object js/c#/vb, and interogate the numbers there.
Note use of /x
modifier.
/^(
(
( # 31 day months
(0[13578])
| ([13578])
| (1[02])
)
[\/]
(
([1-9])
| ([0-2][0-9])
| (3[01])
)
)
| (
( # 30 day months
(0[469])
| ([469])
| (11)
)
[\/]
(
([1-9])
| ([0-2][0-9])
| (30)
)
)
| ( # 29 day month (Feb)
(2|02)
[\/]
(
([1-9])
| ([0-2][0-9])
)
)
)
[\/]
# year
\d{4}$
| ^\d{4}$ # year only
/x
Original
^((((0[13578])|([13578])|(1[02]))[\/](([1-9])|([0-2][0-9])|(3[01])))|(((0[469])|([469])|(11))[\/](([1-9])|([0-2][0-9])|(30)))|((2|02)[\/](([1-9])|([0-2][0-9]))))[\/]\d{4}$|^\d{4}$
rx{
^
$<month> = (\d ** 1..2)
{ $<month> <= 12 or fail }
'/'
$<day> = (\d ** 1..2)
{
given( +$<month> ){
when 1|3|5|7|8|10|12 {
$<day> <= 31 or fail
}
when 4|6|9|11 {
$<day> <= 30 or fail
}
when 2 {
$<day> <= 29 or fail
}
default { fail }
}
}
'/'
$<year> = (\d ** 4)
$
}
After you use this to check the input the values are available in $/
or individually as $<month>
, $<day>
, $<year>
. ( those are just syntax for accessing values in $/
)
No attempt has been made to check the year, or that it doesn't match the 29th of Feburary on non leap years.