Complexity of list.index(x) in Python

后端 未结 6 1150
礼貌的吻别
礼貌的吻别 2020-12-03 04:27

I\'m referring to this: http://docs.python.org/tutorial/datastructures.html

What would be the running time of list.index(x) function in terms of big O n

相关标签:
6条回答
  • 2020-12-03 04:51

    Try this code, it will help you to get your execution time taken by lis.index operator.

    import timeit
    lis=[11,22,33,44,55,66,77] 
    for i in lis: 
        t = timeit.Timer("lis.index(11)", "from main import lis") 
        TimeTaken= t.timeit(number=100000) 
        print (TimeTaken)
    
    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-03 04:54

    Any list implementation is going to have an O(n) complexity for a linear search (e.g., list.index). Although maybe there are some wacky implementations out there that do worse...

    You can improve lookup complexity by using different data structures, such as ordered lists or sets. These are usually implemented with binary trees. However, these data structures put constraints on the elements they contain. In the case of a binary tree, the elements need to be orderable, but the lookup cost goes down to O(log n).

    As mentioned previously, look here for run time costs of standard Python data structures: http://wiki.python.org/moin/TimeComplexity

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-03 04:54

    Use the following code to check the timing. Its complexity is O(n).

    import time
    
    
    class TimeChecker:
    
        def __init__(self, name):
            self.name = name
    
        def __enter__(self):
            self.start = self.get_time_in_sec()
            return self
    
        def __exit__(self, exc_type, exc_val, exc_tb):
            now = self.get_time_in_sec()
            time_taken = now - self.start  # in seconds
            print("Time Taken by " + self.name + ": " + str(time_taken))
    
        def get_time_in_sec(self):
            return int(round(time.time() * 1000))
    
    
    def test_list_index_func(range_num):
        lis = [1,2,3,4,5]
        with TimeChecker('Process 1') as tim:
            for i in range(range_num):
                lis.index(4)
    
    test_list_index_func(1000)
    test_list_index_func(10000)
    test_list_index_func(100000)
    test_list_index_func(1000000)
    
    print("Time: O(n)")
    
    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-03 04:56

    It's O(n), also check out: http://wiki.python.org/moin/TimeComplexity

    This page documents the time-complexity (aka "Big O" or "Big Oh") of various operations in current CPython. Other Python implementations (or older or still-under development versions of CPython) may have slightly different performance characteristics. However, it is generally safe to assume that they are not slower by more than a factor of O(log n)...

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-03 05:07

    According to said documentation:

    list.index(x)
    

    Return the index in the list of the first item whose value is x. It is an error if there is no such item.

    Which implies searching. You're effectively doing x in s but rather than returning True or False you're returning the index of x. As such, I'd go with the listed time complexity of O(n).

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-03 05:07

    The documentation provided above did not cover list.index()

    from my understanding, list.index is O(1) operation. Here is a link if you want to know more. https://www.ics.uci.edu/~pattis/ICS-33/lectures/complexitypython.txt

    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题