I\'m reading through a book about the C# Task Parallel Library and have the following example but the TaskScheduler.UnobservedTaskException handler is never being triggered.
Unfortunately, that example will never show you your code. The UnobservedTaskException
will only happen if a Task gets collected by the GC with an exception unobserved - as long as you hold a reference to task1
and task2
, the GC will never collect, and you'll never see your exception handler.
In order to see the behavior of the UnobservedTaskException
in action, I'd try the following (contrived example):
public static void Main()
{
TaskScheduler.UnobservedTaskException += (object sender, UnobservedTaskExceptionEventArgs eventArgs) =>
{
eventArgs.SetObserved();
((AggregateException)eventArgs.Exception).Handle(ex =>
{
Console.WriteLine("Exception type: {0}", ex.GetType());
return true;
});
};
Task.Factory.StartNew(() =>
{
throw new ArgumentNullException();
});
Task.Factory.StartNew(() =>
{
throw new ArgumentOutOfRangeException();
});
Thread.Sleep(100);
GC.Collect();
GC.WaitForPendingFinalizers();
Console.WriteLine("Done");
Console.ReadKey();
}
This will show you your messages. The first Thread.Sleep(100)
call provides enough time for the tasks to throw. The collect and wait forces a GC collection, which will fire your event handler 2x.
The exception won't be "unobserved" in that sample snippet. Not until the garbage collector gets rid of the Task instances. You'd have to rewrite it like this:
class Program {
static void Main(string[] args) {
TaskScheduler.UnobservedTaskException += ( object sender, UnobservedTaskExceptionEventArgs eventArgs ) =>
{
eventArgs.SetObserved();
( (AggregateException)eventArgs.Exception ).Handle( ex =>
{
Console.WriteLine("Exception type: {0}", ex.GetType());
return true;
} );
};
Run();
GC.Collect();
GC.WaitForPendingFinalizers();
Console.WriteLine("done");
Console.ReadLine();
}
static void Run() {
Task task1 = new Task(() => {
throw new ArgumentNullException();
});
Task task2 = new Task(() => {
throw new ArgumentOutOfRangeException();
});
task1.Start();
task2.Start();
while (!task1.IsCompleted || !task2.IsCompleted) {
Thread.Sleep(50);
}
}
}
Don't do this, use Task.Wait().
I run this code on .NET 4.5, Visual Studio 2012 (Debug or Release, doesn't matter), I did not put ThrowUnobservedTaskException in my app.config:
using System;
using System.Threading;
using System.Threading.Tasks;
namespace Test
{
public static class Program
{
private static void Main()
{
TaskScheduler.UnobservedTaskException += TaskScheduler_UnobservedTaskException;
RunTask();
Thread.Sleep(2000);
GC.Collect();
GC.WaitForPendingFinalizers();
GC.Collect();
Console.ReadLine();
}
static void TaskScheduler_UnobservedTaskException(object sender, UnobservedTaskExceptionEventArgs e)
{
Console.WriteLine("Caught!");
}
private static void RunTask()
{
Task<int> task = Task.Factory.StartNew(() =>
{
Thread.Sleep(1000); // emulate some calculation
Console.WriteLine("Before exception");
throw new Exception();
return 1;
});
}
}
}
And the exception is caught by the UnobservedTaskException handler ("Caught!" is printed).