Eliminate consecutive duplicates of list elements

前端 未结 11 1480
南笙
南笙 2020-12-03 02:31

Is there a \"nice\" way to eliminate consecutive duplicates of list elements?

Example:

[\"red\"; \"red\"; \"blue\"; \"green         


        
相关标签:
11条回答
  • 2020-12-03 03:03

    A simple and very readable solution:

    List<string> results = new List<string>();
    foreach (var element in array)
    {
        if(results.Count == 0 || results.Last() != element)
            results.Add(element);
    }
    
    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-03 03:07

    You can do it in LINQ:

    list.Aggregate(new List<string>(), 
       (current, next) => {
          if (current.Length <= 0 || current[current.Length-1] != next) current.Add(next);
          return current;
       });
    

    Essentially, this creates an initially-empty list, runs through the entire source list, and only add an item to the target list if it is not the same as the last item of the target list.

    You can just as easily (probably easier) do it without LINQ:

    var target = new List<string>();
    foreach (var item in list) {
       if (target.Length <= 0 || target[target.Length-1] != item) target.Add(item);
    }
    
    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-03 03:15

    I think this is the simplest it can get with Linq:

    colors.Where((color, i) => i == 0 || color != colors[i - 1]);
    

    You can try it in C# Interactive:

    > var colors = new[] { "red", "red", "blue", "green", "green", "red", "red", "yellow", "white", "white", "red", "white", "white" };
    > colors.Where((color, i) => i == 0 || color != colors[i - 1])
    WhereIterator { "red", "blue", "green", "red", "yellow", "white", "red", "white" }
    

    The trick here is to use the Where() overload that accepts a predicate with index, then compare to the previous item in the original array.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-03 03:15

    Like this you don't need a new object.

    public static void RemoveConsecutiveDuplicates<T>(this List<T> collection)
    {
        for (int i = 0; i < collection.Count - 1; i++)
        {
            if (collection[i].Equals(collection[i + 1]))
            {
                collection.RemoveAt(i);
                i--;
            }
        }
    }
    
    var collection = new [] { 2, 7, 7, 7, 2, 6, 4 }.ToList();
    collection.RemoveConsecutiveDuplicates();
    
    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-03 03:18

    You can roll your own, linq-style.

    // For completeness, this is two methods to ensure that the null check 
    // is done eagerly while the loop is done lazily. If that's not an issue, 
    // you can forego the check and just use the main function.
    
    public static IEnumerable<T> NonConsecutive<T>(this IEnumerable<T> input)
    {
      if (input == null) throw new ArgumentNullException("input");
      return NonConsecutiveImpl(input);
    }
    
    static IEnumerable<T> NonConsecutiveImpl<T>(this IEnumerable<T> input)
    {
       bool isFirst = true;
       T last = default(T);
       foreach (var item in input) {
          if (isFirst || !object.Equals(item, last)) {
              yield return item;
              last = item;
              isFirst = false;
          }
       }
    }
    

    And use as

    array.NonConsecutive().ToArray()
    

    The advantage is that it's lazily evaluated, so you can use it on any enumeration without having to consume it in its entirety, and chain it with other linq methods (eg: array.Where(i => i != "red").NonConsecutive().Skip(1).ToArray()). If you don't have that requirement and you just want to work with arrays, something like Simon Bartlett's solution might be slightly more performant.

    For more information on why it has to be two methods, see here

    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题