Why does the Win32-API have so many custom types?

Question

I\'m new to the Win32 API and the many new types begin to confuse me.

Some functions take 1-2 ints and 3 UINTS as arguments.

Answer 1

A coworker of mine would say "There is no problem that can't be solved (obfuscated?) by a level of indirection." In WIN32 you'll be dealing with WCHAR, UINT, etc. and you'll get used to it. You wont have to worry when you deploy that DLL which basic type a WCHAR or UNIT compiles to - it will "just work".

Best to read through some of the documentation to get used to it. Especially on the Wide char support (WCHAR, etc.). There's a nice definition on MSDN for WCHAR.

Answer 2

Win32 actually has very few primitive types. What you're looking at is decades of built-up #defines and typedefs and Hungarian notation. Because there was so few types and little or no intellisense developers gave themselves "clues" as to what a particular type was actually supposed to do.

For example, there is no boolean type but there is an "aliased" representation of a integer that tells you that a particular variable is supposed to be treated as a boolean. Take a look at the contents of WinDef.h to see what i mean.

You can take a look here: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa383751(VS.85).aspx for a peek at the veritable tip of the iceberg. For example, notice how HANDLE is the base typedef for every other object that is a "handle" to a windows object. Of course HANDLE is defined somewhere else as a primitive type.

Answer 3

UINT is an unsigned integer. If a parameter value will not / cannot be negative, it makes sense to specify unsigned. LPCWSTR is a pointer to const wide char array, while WCHAR* is non-const.

You should probably compile your app for UNICODE when working with wide chars, or use a conversion routine to convert from narrow to wide.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd319072%28VS.85%29.aspx

http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd374083%28v=VS.85%29.aspx

Answer 4

The Windows API was first created back in the 1980's, and has had to support several different CPU architectures and compilers over the years. They've gone from single-user single-process standalone systems to networked multi-user multi-core security-conscious systems. They had to work around issues with 16-bit vs. 32-bit processors, and now 64-bit processors. They had to work around issues with pre-ANSI C compilers. They had to support C++ compilers in the early unstandardized times. They had to deal with segmented memory. They had to support internationalization before Unicode existed. They had to support some source-level compatibility with MS-DOS, with OS/2, and with Mac OS. They've had to run on several generations of Intel chips, and PowerPC, and MIPS, and Alpha, and ARM. The same basic API is used on for desktop, server, mobile, and embedded systems.

Back in the 1980's, C was considered to be a high-level language (yes, really!) and many people considered it good form to use abstract types rather than just specifying everything as a primitive int, char, or void *. Back when we didn't have IntelliSense and infotips and code browsers and online documentation and the like, such usage hints were helpful, and it made it easier to port code between different compilers and different programming languages.

Yes, it's a horrible mess, but that doesn't mean they did anything wrong.