Is .ix() always better than .loc() and .iloc() since it is faster and supports integer and label access?

后端 未结 1 1337
一向
一向 2020-12-02 09:10

I\'m learning the Python pandas library. Coming from an R background, the indexing and selecting functions seem more complicated than they need to be. My understanding it th

相关标签:
1条回答
  • 2020-12-02 09:35

    Please refer to the doc Different Choices for Indexing, it states clearly when and why you should use .loc, .iloc over .ix, it's about explicit use case:

    .ix supports mixed integer and label based access. It is primarily label based, but will fall back to integer positional access unless the corresponding axis is of integer type. .ix is the most general and will support any of the inputs in .loc and .iloc. .ix also supports floating point label schemes. .ix is exceptionally useful when dealing with mixed positional and label based hierachical indexes.

    However, when an axis is integer based, ONLY label based access and not positional access is supported. Thus, in such cases, it’s usually better to be explicit and use .iloc or .loc.

    Hope this helps.

    Update 22 Mar 2017

    Thanks to comment from @Alexander, Pandas is going to deprecate ix in 0.20, details in here.

    One of the strong reason behind is because mixing indexes -- positional and label (effectively using ix) has been a significant source of problems for users.

    It is expected to migrate to use iloc and loc instead, here is a link on how to convert code.

    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题