Ruby's yield feature in relation to computer science

前端 未结 4 440
夕颜
夕颜 2020-12-02 07:58

I recently discovered Ruby\'s blocks and yielding features, and I was wondering: where does this fit in terms of computer science theory? Is it a functional programming tech

相关标签:
4条回答
  • 2020-12-02 08:07

    I think 'coroutine' is the keyword you're looking for.

    E.g. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yield

    Yield in computing and information science:

    • in computer science, a point of return (and re-entry) of a coroutine
    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-02 08:09

    Ruby's yield is not an iterator like in C# and Python. yield itself is actually a really simple concept once you understand how blocks work in Ruby.

    Yes, blocks are a functional programming feature, even though Ruby is not properly a functional language. In fact, Ruby uses the method lambda to create block objects, which is borrowed from Lisp's syntax for creating anonymous functions — which is what blocks are. From a computer science standpoint, Ruby's blocks (and Lisp's lambda functions) are closures. In Ruby, methods usually take only one block. (You can pass more, but it's awkward.)

    The yield keyword in Ruby is just a way of calling a block that's been given to a method. These two examples are equivalent:

    def with_log
      output = yield # We're calling our block here with yield
      puts "Returned value is #{output}"
    end
    
    def with_log(&stuff_to_do) # the & tells Ruby to convert into
                               # an object without calling lambda
      output = stuff_to_do.call # We're explicitly calling the block here
      puts "Returned value is #{output}"
    end
    

    In the first case, we're just assuming there's a block and say to call it. In the other, Ruby wraps the block in an object and passes it as an argument. The first is more efficient and readable, but they're effectively the same. You'd call either one like this:

    with_log do
      a = 5
      other_num = gets.to_i
      @my_var = a + other_num
    end
    

    And it would print the value that wound up getting assigned to @my_var. (OK, so that's a completely stupid function, but I think you get the idea.)

    Blocks are used for a lot of things in Ruby. Almost every place you'd use a loop in a language like Java, it's replaced in Ruby with methods that take blocks. For example,

    [1,2,3].each {|value| print value} # prints "123"
    [1,2,3].map {|value| 2**value}    # returns [2, 4, 8]
    [1,2,3].reject {|value| value % 2 == 0} # returns [1, 3]
    

    As Andrew noted, it's also commonly used for opening files and many other places. Basically anytime you have a standard function that could use some custom logic (like sorting an array or processing a file), you'll use a block. There are other uses too, but this answer is already so long I'm afraid it will cause heart attacks in readers with weaker constitutions. Hopefully this clears up the confusion on this topic.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-02 08:09

    There's more to yield and blocks than mere looping.

    The series Enumerating enumerable has a series of things you can do with enumerations, such as asking if a statement is true for any member of a group, or if it's true for all the members, or searching for any or all members meeting a certain condition.

    Blocks are also useful for variable scope. Rather than merely being convenient, it can help with good design. For example, the code

    File.open("filename", "w") do |f|
      f.puts "text"
    end
    

    ensures that the file stream is closed when you're finished with it, even if an exception occurs, and that the variable is out of scope once you're finished with it.

    A casual google didn't come up with a good blog post about blocks and yields in ruby. I don't know why.

    Response to comment:

    I suspect it gets closed because of the block ending, not because the variable goes out of scope.

    My understanding is that nothing special happens when the last variable pointing to an object goes out of scope, apart from that object being eligible for garbage collection. I don't know how to confirm this, though.

    I can show that the file object gets closed before it gets garbage collected, which usually doesn't happen immediately. In the following example, you can see that a file object is closed in the second puts statement, but it hasn't been garbage collected.

    g = nil
    File.open("/dev/null") do |f|
      puts f.inspect # #<File:/dev/null>
      puts f.object_id # Some number like 70233884832420
      g = f
    end
    puts g.inspect # #<File:/dev/null (closed)>
    puts g.object_id # The exact same number as the one printed out above,
      # indicating that g points to the exact same object that f pointed to
    
    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-02 08:22

    I think the yield statement originated from the CLU language. I always wonder if the character from Tron was named after CLU too....

    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题