Package objects

Question

What are package objects, not so much the concept but their usage?

I\'ve tried to get an example working and the only form I got to work was as follows:

Answer 1

While Moritz's answer is spot on, one additional thing to note is that package objects are objects. Among other things, this means you can build them up from traits, using mix-in inheritance. Moritz's example could be written as

package object bar extends Versioning 
                          with JodaAliases 
                          with JavaAliases {

  // package wide constants:
  override val version = "1.0"

  // or type aliases
  type StringMap[+T] = Map[String,T]

  // Define implicits needed to effectively use your API:
  implicit def a2b(a: A): B = // ...

}

Here Versioning is an abstract trait, which says that the package object must have a "version" method, while JodaAliases and JavaAliases are concrete traits containing handy type aliases. All of these traits can be reused by many different package objects.

Answer 2

Normally you would put your package object in a separate file called package.scala in the package that it corresponds to. You can also use the nested package syntax but that is quite unusual.

The main use case for package objects is when you need definitions in various places inside your package as well as outside the package when you use the API defined by the package. Here is an example:

// file: foo/bar/package.scala

package foo

package object bar {

  // package wide constants:
  def BarVersionString = "1.0"

  // or type aliases
  type StringMap[+T] = Map[String,T]

  // can be used to emulate a package wide import
  // especially useful when wrapping a Java API
  type DateTime = org.joda.time.DateTime

  type JList[T] = java.util.List[T]

  // Define implicits needed to effectively use your API:
  implicit def a2b(a: A): B = // ...

}

Now the definitions inside that package object are available inside the whole package foo.bar. Furthermore the definitions get imported when someone outside of that package imports foo.bar._.

This way you can prevent to require the API client to issue additional imports to use your library effectively - e.g. in scala-swing you need to write

import swing._
import Swing._

to have all the goodness like onEDT and implicit conversions from Tuple2 to Dimension.

Answer 3

You could do worse than to go straight to the source. :)

https://lampsvn.epfl.ch/trac/scala/browser/scala/trunk/src/library/scala/package.scala

https://lampsvn.epfl.ch/trac/scala/browser/scala/trunk/src/library/scala/collection/immutable/package.scala

Answer 4

The main use case for package objects is when you need definitions in various places inside your package as well as outside the package when you use the API defined by the package.

Not so with Scala 3, scheduled to be released mid-2020, based on Dotty, as in here:

Toplevel Definitions

All kinds of definitions can be written on the toplevel.
Package objects are no longer needed, will be phased out.

package p 

type Labelled[T] = (String, T) 
val a: Labelled[Int] = ("count", 1) 
def b = a._2 
def hello(name: String) = println(i"hello, $name)