What is the difference between a URI, a URL and a URN?

前端 未结 30 1273
小蘑菇
小蘑菇 2020-11-22 02:18

People talk about URLs, URIs, and URNs as if they\'re different things, but they look the same to the naked eye.

W

相关标签:
30条回答
  • 2020-11-22 02:45

    Due to difficulties to clearly distinguish between URI and URL, as far as I remember W3C does not make a difference any longer between URI and URL (http://www.w3.org/Addressing/).

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-11-22 02:45

    URI, URL, URN

    As the image above indicates, there are three distinct components at play here. It’s usually best to go to the source when discussing matters like these, so here’s an exerpt from Tim Berners-Lee, et. al. in RFC 3986: Uniform Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax:

    A Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) is a compact sequence of characters that identifies an abstract or physical resource.

    A URI can be further classified as a locator, a name, or both. The term “Uniform Resource Locator” (URL) refers to the subset of URIs that, in addition to identifying a resource, provide a means of locating the resource by describing its primary access mechanism (e.g., its network “location”).

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-11-22 02:45

    A URI identifies a resource either by location, or a name, or both. More often than not, most of us use URIs that defines a location to a resource. The fact that a URI can identify a resources by both name and location has lead to a lot of the confusion in my opinion. A URI has two specializations known as URL and URN.

    A URL is a specialization of URI that defines the network location of a specific resource. Unlike a URN, the URL defines how the resource can be obtained. We use URLs every day in the form of http://stackoverflow.com, etc. But a URL doesn’t have to be an HTTP URL, it can be ftp://example.com, etc.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-11-22 02:45

    After reading through the posts, I find some very relevant comments. In short, the confusion between the URL and URI definitions is based in part on which definition depends on which and also informal use of the word URI in software development.

    By definition URL is a subset of URI [RFC2396]. URI contain URN and URL. Both URI and URL each have their own specific syntax that confers upon them the status of being either URI or URL. URN are for uniquely identifying a resource while URL are for locating a resource. Note that a resource can have more than one URL but only a single URN.[RFC2611]

    As web developers and programmers we will almost always be concerned with URL and therefore URI. Now a URL is specifically defined to have all the parts scheme:scheme-specific-part, like for example https://stackoverflow.com/questions. This is a URL and it is also a URI. Now consider a relative link embedded in the page such as ../index.html. This is no longer a URL by definition. It is still what is referred to as a "URI-reference" [RFC2396].

    I believe that when the word URI is used to refer to relative paths, "URI-reference" is actually what is being thought of. So informally, software systems use URI to refer to relative pathing and URL for the absolute address. So in this sense, a relative path is no longer a URL but still URI.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-11-22 02:45

    URIs came about from the need to identify resources on the Web, and other Internet resources such as electronic mailboxes in a uniform and coherent way. So, one can introduce a new type of widget: URIs to identify widget resources or use tel: URIs to have web links cause telephone calls to be made when invoked.

    Some URIs provide information to locate a resource (such as a DNS host name and a path on that machine), while some are used as pure resource names. The URL is reserved for identifiers that are resource locators, including 'http' URLs such as http://stackoverflow.com, which identifies the web page at the given path on the host. Another example is 'mailto' URLs, such as mailto:fred@mail.org, which identifies the mailbox at the given address.

    URNs are URIs that are used as pure resource names rather than locators. For example, the URI: mid:0E4FC272-5C02-11D9-B115-000A95B55BC8@stackoverflow.com is a URN that identifies the email message containing it in its 'Message-Id' field. The URI serves to distinguish that message from any other email message. But it does not itself provide the message's address in any store.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-11-22 02:46

    Here is my simplification:

    URN: unique resource name, i.e. "what" (eg urn:issn:1234-5678 ). This is meant to be unique .. as in no two different docs can have the same urn. A bit like "uuid"

    URL: "where" to find it ( eg https://google.com/pub?issnid=1234-5678 .. or ftp://somesite.com/doc8.pdf )

    URI: can be either a URN or a URL. This fuzzy definition is thanks to RFC 3986 produced by W3C and IETF.

    The definition of URI has changed over the years, so it makes sense for most people to be confused. However, you can now take solace in the fact that you can refer to http://somesite.com/something as either a URL or URI ... an you will be right either way (at least fot the time being anyway...)

    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题