I learned about one address, two address, and three address instruction, but now I\'d like to know, what kind of address instruction does x86 use?
x86 is a CISC register machine, where at most 1 operand for any instruction can be an explicit memory address instead of a register, using an addressing mode like [rdi + rax*4]
. (There are instruction which can have 2 memory operands with one or both being implicit, though: What x86 instructions take two (or more) memory operands?)
Typical x86 integer instructions have 2 operands, both explicit, like add eax, edx which does eax+=edx
.
And some truly 1-operand ALU instructions (no implicit other operand) like inc
/dec
, neg
, not
which are shortcuts for add/sub of implicit 1, or sub from 0, or XOR with -1 (some with different FLAGS semantics). And there's bswap
. Also the shift/rotate instructions with an implicit 1 count are basically 1-operand, and some assemblers do let you write shr %eax
.
Legacy x87 FP code uses 1-operand instructions with the x87 stack, like faddp st1
where the top of the x87 stack (st0
) is an implicit operand. And some 0-operand instructions like fchs
that operate only on st0
implicitly. (SSE2 is baseline for x86-64, so x87 is no longer widely used.)
Modern FP code uses SSE/SSE2 2-operand instructions like addsd xmm0,xmm1
or 3-operand AVX encodings like vaddsd xmm2, xmm0, xmm1
There are x86 instructions with 0, 1, 2, 3, and even 4 explicit operands.
There are multiple instruction formats, but explicit reg/memory operands are normally encoded in a ModR/M byte that follows the opcode byte(s). (x86-64 instruction encoding on osdev has good details and diagrams). It has 3 fields:
reg
, register indirect [reg]
, [reg+disp8]
, [reg+disp32]
). The modes with displacement bits signal that those bytes follow the ModR/M byte.r/m, immediate
instructions, used as extra opcode bits, e.g. for shifts/rotates selects which kind.)Most instructions are available in at least 2 encodings, reg/memory destination or reg/memory source. If the operands you want are both registers, you can use either opcode, either the add r/m32, r32
or add r32, r/m32
. (Some assemblers have syntax to let you select the non-default encoding. In theory an assembler / compiler could use these choices as a watermark to show which tool produced it.)
Common instructions also have other opcodes for immediate source forms, but typically they use the reg
field in ModR/M as extra opcode bits, so you still only get 2 operands like add eax, 123
. An exception to this is the immediate form of imul
added with 186, e.g. imul eax, [rdi + rbx*4], 12345. Instead of sharing coding space with other immediate instructions, it has a register dst and a r/m source in ModR/M plus the immediate operand implied by the opcode.
Some one-operand instructions use the same trick of using the reg
field as extra opcode bits, but without an immediate. e.g. neg r/m32
, not r/m32
, inc r/m32
, or the shl
/shr
/rotate encodings that shift by an implicit 1 (not by cl
or an immediate). So unfortunately you can't copy-and-shift (until BMI2).
There are some special-case encodings to improve code density, like single-byte encodings for push rax
/push rdx
that pack the reg
field into the low 3 bits of the opcode byte. And in 16/32-bit mode, one-byte encodings for inc
/dec
any register. But in 64-bit mode those 0x4?
codes are used as REX prefixes to extend the reg
and r/m
fields to provide 16 architectural registers.
There are also instructions with some or all implicit operands, like movsb
which copies a byte from [rsi]
to [rdi]
, and can be used with a rep
prefix to repeat that rcx
times.
Or mul ecx
does edx:eax = eax * ecx
. One explicit source operand, one implicit source, and 2 implicit destination registers. div
/idiv
are similar.
Instructions with at least 1 explicit reg/mem operand use a ModR/M encoding for it, but instructions with zero explicit operands (like movsb
or cdq) have no ModR/M byte. They just have the opcode. Some instructions have no operands at all, not even implicit, like mfence.
Immediate operands can't be signalled through ModR/M, only by the opcode itself, so push imm32 or push imm8 have their own opcodes. The implicit destinations (memory at [rsp]
, and RSP itself being updated to rsp-=8
).
LEA is a workaround that gives x86 3-operand shift-and-add, like lea eax, [rdi + rdi*2 + 123]
to do eax = rdi*3 + 123
in one instruction. See Using LEA on values that aren't addresses / pointers? The destination register is encoded in ModR/M's reg
field, and the two source registers are encoded in the addressing mode. (Involving a SIB byte, the presence of which is signalled by the ModR/M byte using the encoding that would otherwise mean base = RSP).
VEX prefixes (introduced with AVX) provide 3-operand instructions like bzhi eax, [rsi], edx or vaddps ymm0, ymm1, [rsi]
. (For many instructions, the 2nd source is the one that's optionally memory, but for some it's the first source.)
The 3rd operand is encoded in the 2 or 3-byte VEX prefix.
There are a few 3-operand non-VEX instructions, such as SSE4.1 variable blends like vpblendvb xmm1, xmm2/m128, <XMM0> where XMM0 is an implicit operand using that register.
The AVX version makes it non-destructive (with a separate destination encoded in the VEX prefix), and makes the blend-control operand explicit (encoded in the high 4 bits of a 1-byte immediate). This gives us an instruction with 4 explicit operands, VPBLENDVB xmm1, xmm2, xmm3/m128, xmm4
.
x86 is pretty wild and has been extended many times, but typical integer code uses mostly 2-operand instructions, with a good amount of LEA thrown in to save instructions.