sizeof union larger than expected. How does type alignment take place here?

后端 未结 3 1948
别那么骄傲
别那么骄傲 2020-12-02 02:15
#include 

union u1 {
    struct {
        int *i;
    } s1;
    struct {
        int i, j;
    } s2;
};

union u2 {
    struct {
        int *i, j;
          


        
相关标签:
3条回答
  • 2020-12-02 02:31

    That's because the compiler needs to keep the entire struct (as well as the union) aligned to 8 bytes - due to the fact that you have a pointer inside. (which is 8-bytes in your case)

    So even though you add only 4 bytes with the extra int, struct-alignment forces everything to be aligned to 8 bytes - hence the +8 to bring the total size to 16 bytes.

    The result of this is that:

    struct {
        int *i, j;
    } s1;
    

    has a size of 16 bytes. Since a union must be at least as large as the largest element, it is also forced up to 16.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_structure_alignment

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-02 02:31

    Since a pointer is 8 bytes on your platform, it most probably also requires an alignment of 8 bytes. So when adding another 4 bytes, the struct cannot just have a size of 12 bytes, in which case the individual elements of say an array of u2s would not be properly aligned at 8 byte boundaries, which is neccessary for the pointer member. So you need to increase its size to the next multiple of 8, which is 16. The additional 4 bytes are just unused/undefined.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-02 02:33

    The struct u2.s2 is 16 bytes because of alignment constraints. The compiler is guaranteeing that if you make an array of such structs, each pointer will be aligned on an 8-byte boundary. The field *i takes 8 bytes, then j takes 4 bytes, and the compiler inserts 4 bytes of padding. Because the struct is 16 bytes, the union containing it is also 16 bytes.

    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题