size of array in c

后端 未结 6 1296
伪装坚强ぢ
伪装坚强ぢ 2020-12-01 20:59

a simple question that bugs me. Say I have an array defined in main like so int arr[5]. Now, if I\'m still inside main and I set int i = sizeof(arr)/sizeo

相关标签:
6条回答
  • 2020-12-01 21:27

    I didn't understand the first question (post some code, please), but for the second:

    sizeof(*arr) ;   // is sizeof(int) as arr is of type "int *"
    sizeof(arr[0]) ; // is sizeof(int), as arr[0] is the first
                     //     item of an array of int
    

    Fact is, *arr and arr[0] mean exactly the same thing, but said differently. In fact, let say n is an index: *(arr + n) is the same than arr[n].

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-01 21:29

    You should understand the difference between static and dynamic arrays. Static arrays are types like int, float, double etc. They are different. Even

    int a[10];
    

    has a different type from

    int b[11];
    

    At compile time, the number of elements in static arrays are known and the sizeof operator returns the number of bytes they occupy.

    With pointers that were initialized, either to point to some variable, or to an allocated memory, it is at run-time that it would be apparent where they are pointing to and the compiler cannot determine what would be the size of that array in the future. Therefore, the sizeof a pointer gives you 4 (or 8 in 64bits systems for example).

    Note that sizeof operator works at compile-time and not at run-time.

    If you need to know the size of an allocated memory (through malloc), you have no choice but to save the size of the array in another variable, for example right after you did the malloc.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-01 21:30

    It's because of the difference between an array of known size and a pointer to an array of unknown size. sizeof is done at compile time and it's not possible for the compiler to tell the size of a dynamically created memory region in advance.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-01 21:37

    C arrays don't store their own sizes anywhere, so sizeof only works the way you expect if the size is known at compile time. malloc() is treated by the compiler as any other function, so sizeof can't tell that arr points to the first element of an array, let alone how big it is. If you need to know the size of the array, you need to explicitly pass it to your function, either as a separate argument, or by using a struct containing a pointer to your array and its size.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-01 21:37

    as far as I know arr is a pointer inside main too!

    That's the mistake. In main, where you defined int arr[5], arr is an array, not a pointer. Its size is equal to the size of the array, so 5*sizeof(int). When you passed it as a function parameter, that parameter had type int*, so inside the function, you were taking the size of an int* rather than an int[5].

    Here the output is 1. Any ideas why?

    This time, arr really is a pointer, since you declared it int *arr. But either way, whether it's int *arr or int a[5], *arr and arr[0] mean exactly the same thing: the first element. So of course they have the same size, and sizeof(*arr) / sizeof(arr[0]) is 1.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-01 21:47

    This is because arr is now a pointer and it could point to a single int or an array of 1000 ints the function just does not know. You will have to pass the size of the array into the function.

    In main arr is declared as an int[5] and so the size can be calculated by the compiler.

    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题