What REALLY happens when you don't free after malloc?

前端 未结 18 760
南旧
南旧 2020-11-22 01:32

This has been something that has bothered me for ages now.

We are all taught in school (at least, I was) that you MUST free every pointer that is allocated. I\'m a

相关标签:
18条回答
  • 2020-11-22 02:23

    Yes you are right, your example doesn't do any harm (at least not on most modern operating systems). All the memory allocated by your process will be recovered by the operating system once the process exits.

    Source: Allocation and GC Myths (PostScript alert!)

    Allocation Myth 4: Non-garbage-collected programs should always deallocate all memory they allocate.

    The Truth: Omitted deallocations in frequently executed code cause growing leaks. They are rarely acceptable. but Programs that retain most allocated memory until program exit often perform better without any intervening deallocation. Malloc is much easier to implement if there is no free.

    In most cases, deallocating memory just before program exit is pointless. The OS will reclaim it anyway. Free will touch and page in the dead objects; the OS won't.

    Consequence: Be careful with "leak detectors" that count allocations. Some "leaks" are good!

    That said, you should really try to avoid all memory leaks!

    Second question: your design is ok. If you need to store something until your application exits then its ok to do this with dynamic memory allocation. If you don't know the required size upfront, you can't use statically allocated memory.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-11-22 02:24

    It is completely fine to leave memory unfreed when you exit; malloc() allocates the memory from the memory area called "the heap", and the complete heap of a process is freed when the process exits.

    That being said, one reason why people still insist that it is good to free everything before exiting is that memory debuggers (e.g. valgrind on Linux) detect the unfreed blocks as memory leaks, and if you have also "real" memory leaks, it becomes more difficult to spot them if you also get "fake" results at the end.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-11-22 02:26

    What's the real result here?

    Your program leaked the memory. Depending on your OS, it may have been recovered.

    Most modern desktop operating systems do recover leaked memory at process termination, making it sadly common to ignore the problem, as can be seen by many other answers here.)

    But you are relying on a safety feature you should not rely upon, and your program (or function) might run on a system where this behaviour does result in a "hard" memory leak, next time.

    You might be running in kernel mode, or on vintage / embedded operating systems which do not employ memory protection as a tradeoff. (MMUs take up die space, memory protection costs additional CPU cycles, and it is not too much to ask from a programmer to clean up after himself).

    You can use and re-use memory any way you like, but make sure you deallocated all resources before exiting.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-11-22 02:27

    You are correct, memory is automatically freed when the process exits. Some people strive not to do extensive cleanup when the process is terminated, since it will all be relinquished to the operating system. However, while your program is running you should free unused memory. If you don't, you may eventually run out or cause excessive paging if your working set gets too big.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-11-22 02:30

    If you're using the memory you've allocated, then you're not doing anything wrong. It becomes a problem when you write functions (other than main) that allocate memory without freeing it, and without making it available to the rest of your program. Then your program continues running with that memory allocated to it, but no way of using it. Your program and other running programs are deprived of that memory.

    Edit: It's not 100% accurate to say that other running programs are deprived of that memory. The operating system can always let them use it at the expense of swapping your program out to virtual memory (</handwaving>). The point is, though, that if your program frees memory that it isn't using then a virtual memory swap is less likely to be necessary.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-11-22 02:31

    If a program forgets to free a few Megabytes before it exits the operating system will free them. But if your program runs for weeks at a time and a loop inside the program forgets to free a few bytes in each iteration you will have a mighty memory leak that will eat up all the available memory in your computer unless you reboot it on a regular basis => even small memory leaks might be bad if the program is used for a seriously big task even if it originally wasn't designed for one.

    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题