I like to send a generic type converter function to a method but I can\'t figure out how to do it.
Here\'s invalid syntax that explains what I like to achieve, the p
You cannot have instances of generic functions or actions - all type parameters are defined upfront and cannot be redefined by the caller.
An easy way would be to avoid polymorphism altogether by relying on down-casting:
public void SomeUtility(Func<Type, object, object> converter)
{
var myType = (MyType)converter(typeof(MyType), "foo");
}
If you want type safety, you need to defer the definition of the type parameters to the caller. You can do this by composing a generic method within an interface:
public void SomeUtility(IConverter converter)
{
var myType = converter.Convert<MyType>("foo");
}
interface IConverter
{
T Convert<T>(object obj);
}
Edit:
If the 'converter type' is known at the call-site, and only this type will be used inside the utility method, then you can define a generic type on the method and use that, just like other posters have suggested.
You have to know the T type at compile-time to use it. The T can either be specified at class-level or at method-level.
class SomeClass<T> {
public void SomeUtility(Func<object, T> converter) {
var myType = converter("foo"); // Already is the T-type that you specified.
}
}
or
public void SomeUtility<T>(Func<object, T> converter) {
var myType = converter("foo"); // Already is the T-type that you specified.
}
You need to make SomeUtility
generic as well. Doing this and fixing the syntax gives:
public void SomeUtility<T>(Func<object,T> converter)
{
var myType = converter("foo");
}
public void SomeUtility<T>(Func<object, T> converter)
{
var myType = converter("foo");
}
and then:
SomeUtility(arg => new MyType());
The generic type inference will work in this case.