Protect .NET code from reverse engineering?

后端 未结 30 1913
-上瘾入骨i
-上瘾入骨i 2020-11-22 01:17

Obfuscation is one way, but it can\'t protect from breaking the piracy protection security of the application. How do I make sure that the application is not tampered with,

相关标签:
30条回答
  • 2020-11-22 01:21

    If Microsoft could come up with a solution, we will not have pirated Windows versions, so nothing is very secure. Here are some similar questions from Stack Overflow and you can implement your own way of protecting them. If you are releasing different versions then you can adopt different techniques for different version so by the time first one is cracked the second one can take over.

    • Managing features on a license basis for a C++ application

    • Secure a DLL file with a license file

    • Licensing / protection software?

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-11-22 01:24

    Unfortunately, you are not going to run away from this. Your best bet is to write your code in C and P/Invoke it.

    There is a small catch-22, someone could just decompile your application to CIL and kill any verification/activation code (for example, the call to your C library). Remember that applications that are written in C are also reverse-engineered by the more persistent hackers (just look at how fast games are cracked these days). Nothing will protect your application.

    In the end it works a lot like your home, protect it well enough so that it is too much effort (spaghetti code would help here) and so that the assailant just moves onto your next door neighbor (competition :) ). Look at Windows Vista, there must be 10 different ways to crack it.

    There are packages out there that will encrypt your EXE file and decrypt it when the user is allowed to use it, but once again, that is using a generic solution that has no doubt been cracked.

    Activation and registration mechanisms are aimed at the 'average Joe:' people who don't have enough tech savvy to bypass it (or for that matter know that they can bypass it). Don't bother with crackers, they have far too much time on their hands.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-11-22 01:24

    Frankly, sometimes we need to obfuscate the code (for example, register license classes and so on). In this case, your project is not free. IMO, you should pay for a good obfucator.

    Dotfuscator hides your code and .NET Reflector shows an error when you attempt to decompile it.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-11-22 01:26

    If it's written in .NET and compiled to CIL, it can be reflected. If security is a concern and obfuscation is to be avoided, then I recommend writing your application using a non-managed language, which is, by nature, harder to reverse engineer.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-11-22 01:27
    • Use online update to block those unlicensed copies.

    • Verify serial number from different modules of your application and do not use a single function call to do the verification (so that crackers cannot bypass the verification easily).

    • Not only check serial number at startup, do the verification while saving data, do it every Friday evening, do it when user is idle ...

    • Verify application file check sum, store your security check sum in different places.

    • Don't go too far on these kind of tricks, make sure your application never crash/get into malfunction while verifying registration code.

    • Build a useful app for users is much more important than make a
      unbreakable binary for crackers.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-11-22 01:27

    You can..

    Microsoft SLP ServicesInishTech's Software Potential offers the ability to help protect code without affecting the functionality of your applications.

    UPDATE: (Disclosure: I work on Eazfuscator.NET) What makes Microsoft SLP ServicesSoftware Potential different is the ability to virtualize the code, so you definitely can. Several years passed since the question was originally asked; today there are more products available that also work on a similar basis such as:

    • Agile.NET
    • Eazfuscator.NET
    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题