Say I want to have a method that takes any kind of number, is there a base class (or some other concept) that I can use?
As far as I know I have to make overloads f
The base class of the numeric types is ValueType.
Unfortunately that still won't help you: DateTime
, bool
, Enum
and hundreds of other types also derive from ValueType
. There's no NumericType
base class in .NET.
What I do:
public interface INumeric<T>
{
T Zero { get; }
T One { get; }
T MaxValue { get; }
T MinValue { get; }
T Add(T a, T b);
// T Substract(....
// T Mult...
}
public struct Numeric:
INumeric<int>,
INumeric<float>,
INumeric<byte>,
INumeric<decimal>,
// INumeric<other types>
{
int INumeric<int>.Zero => 0;
int INumeric<int>.One => 1;
int INumeric<int>.MinValue => int.MinValue;
int INumeric<int>.MaxValue => int.MaxValue;
int INumeric<int>.Add(int x, int y) => x + y;
// other implementations...
}
Now, you can use it in a method:
bool IsZero<TNum, T>(TNum ops, T number)
where TNum : INumeric<T>
{
return number == ops.Zero;
}
or extension method
public static bool IsZero<TNum, T>(this TNum ops, T number)
where TNum : INumeric<T>
{
return number == ops.Zero;
}
and in your code:
...
var n = new Numeric(); // can be an static prop
Console.WriteLine(IsZero(n, 5)); // false
Console.WriteLine(IsZero(n, 0f)); // true
Console.WriteLine(IsZero(n, "0")); // compiler error
or, with extension method:
Console.WriteLine(n.IsZero(5)); // false
Console.WriteLine(n.IsZero(0f)); // true
Console.WriteLine(n.IsZero("0")); // compiler error
There isn't one (or at least, not one that just means "numbers"). You could use:
void Foo<T>(T value) where T : struct {...}
But that allows any struct - not just numbers. If you want to do arithmetic, generic operators may be of use. Other than that; overloads it the most viable option.
The short answer is: Numeric types are value types, hence they derive from System.ValueType. The full answer is: you should read this article from MSDN. Moreover I think that you should read C# language reference :). Value type not equals numeric type, because values types include also structures and enumerations.
Are overloaded method signitures out of the question here? If you want a constrained group of methods to performe the same task you could voerload the public method and call a private method that takes any number via casting the input to a double.
The answer is: you don't need to provide overloads for ALL the numeric types, just for Double and Decimal. All others (except maybe some very unusually large ones) will be automatically converted to these.
Not a base class but in fact that was the red herring. The base class System.ValueType doesn't help much as it includes types that are not numerics. The language reference i was reading was what got me confused in the first place :)
(I was just looking for who to attribute the answer to and it was a combination of Scarecrow and Marc Gravell, but since they were comments i have put the answer here)