C# Compare two dictionaries for equality

后端 未结 10 796
独厮守ぢ
独厮守ぢ 2020-12-01 10:41

I want to compare in C# two dictionaries with as keys a string and as value a list of ints. I assume two dictionaries to be equal when they both ha

相关标签:
10条回答
  • 2020-12-01 11:34

    I know this question already has an accepted answer, but I'd like to offer an even simpler alternative:

    using System.Linq;
    using System.Collections.Generic;
    
    namespace Foo
    {
        public static class DictionaryExtensionMethods
        {
            public static bool ContentEquals<TKey, TValue>(this Dictionary<TKey, TValue> dictionary, Dictionary<TKey, TValue> otherDictionary)
            {
                return (otherDictionary ?? new Dictionary<TKey, TValue>())
                    .OrderBy(kvp => kvp.Key)
                    .SequenceEqual((dictionary ?? new Dictionary<TKey, TValue>())
                                       .OrderBy(kvp => kvp.Key));
            }
        }
    }
    
    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-01 11:34

    The accepted answer above will not always return a correct comparison because using a HashSet to compare 2 lists will not account for duplicate values in the lists. For instance if the OP had:

    var dict1 = new Dictionary<string, List<int>>() { { "A", new List<int>() { 1, 2, 1 } } };
    var dict2 = new Dictionary<string, List<int>>() { { "A", new List<int>() { 2, 2, 1 } } };
    

    Then the result of the dictionary comparison is they are equal, when they are not. The only solution I see is to sort the 2 list and compare the values by index, but I'm sure someone smarter then me can come up with a more efficient way.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-01 11:38

    Here is a way using Linq, probably sacrificing some efficiency for tidy code. The other Linq example from jfren484 actually fails the DoesOrderValuesMatter() test, because it depends on the default Equals() for List<int>, which is order-dependent.

    private bool AreDictionariesEqual(Dictionary<string, List<int>> dict1, Dictionary<string, List<int>> dict2)
    {
        string dict1string = String.Join(",", dict1.OrderBy(kv => kv.Key).Select(kv => kv.Key + ":" + String.Join("|", kv.Value.OrderBy(v => v))));
        string dict2string = String.Join(",", dict2.OrderBy(kv => kv.Key).Select(kv => kv.Key + ":" + String.Join("|", kv.Value.OrderBy(v => v))));
    
        return dict1string.Equals(dict2string);
    }
    
    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-01 11:39

    If two dictionaries are known to use equivalent implementations of IEqualityComparer, and one wishes to regard as equivalent all keys which that implementation regardss as equivalent, they contain the same number of items, and one (arbitrarily chosen) maps all of the elements keys found in the other to corresponding values from the other, they will be equivalent unless or until one of them is modified. Testing for those conditions will be faster than any approach which does not not assume that both dictionaries use the same IEqualityComparer.

    If two dictionaries do not use the same implementation of IEqualityComparer, they should generally not be considered equivalent regardless of the items they contain. For example, a Dictionary<String,String> with a case-sensitive comparer and one with a case-insensitive comparer, both of which contain the key-value pair ("Fred", "Quimby") are not equivalent, since the latter would map "FRED" to "Quimby", but the former would not.

    Only if the dictionaries use the same implementation of IEqualityComparer, but if one is interested in a finer-grained definition of key-equality than the one used by the dictionaries and a copy of the key is not stored with each value, it will it be necessary to build a new dictionary for the purpose of testing the original dictionaries for equality. It may be best to delay this step until the earlier test has suggested that the dictionaries seem to match. Then build a Dictionary<TKey,TKey> which maps each key from one of the dictionaries to itself, and then look up all of the other dictionary's keys in that to make sure that they map to things which match. If both dictionaries used case-insensitive comparers, and one contained ("Fred", "Quimby") and the other ("FRED", "Quimby"), the new temporary dictionary would map "FRED" to "Fred", and comparing those two strings would reveal that the dictionaries don't match.

    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题