I have a numpy array like this:
x = np.array([[1,2,3],[4,5,6],[7,8,9]])
I need to create a function let\'s call it \"neighbors\" with the f
Possibly use a KDTree in SciPy ?
I agree with Joe Kingtons response, just an add to the footprints
import numpy as np
from scipy.ndimage import generate_binary_structure
from scipy.ndimage import iterate_structure
foot = np.array(generate_binary_structure(2, 1),dtype=int)
or for bigger/different footprints for ex.
np.array(iterate_structure(foot , 2),dtype=int)
By using max
and min
, you handle pixels at the upper and lower bounds:
im[max(i-1,0):min(i+2,i_end), max(j-1,0):min(j+2,j_end)].flatten()
We first init our matrix of interest using numpy
import numpy as np
x = np.array([[1,2,3],[4,5,6],[7,8,9]])
print(x)
[[1 2 3]
[4 5 6]
[7 8 9]]
Our neighbors is a function of distance for instance we might be interested in neighbors of distance 2 this tells us how should we pad our matrix x. We choose to pad with zeros but you can pad with whatever you like might be mean,mode,median of a row/column
d = 2
x_padded = np.pad(x,d,mode='constant')
print(x_padded)
[[0 0 0 0 0 0 0]
[0 0 0 0 0 0 0]
[0 0 1 2 3 0 0]
[0 0 4 5 6 0 0]
[0 0 7 8 9 0 0]
[0 0 0 0 0 0 0]
[0 0 0 0 0 0 0]]
We use x_padded
matrix to get neighbors of any value in matrix x
.
Let (i,j)
and (s,t)
be indexes of x
and x_padded
respectively. Now we need to translate (i,j)
to (s,t)
to get neighbors of (i,j)
i,j = 2,1
s,t = 2*d+i+1, 2*d+j+1
window = x_padded[i:s, j:t]
print(window)
[[0 1 2 3 0]
[0 4 5 6 0]
[0 7 8 9 0]
[0 0 0 0 0]
[0 0 0 0 0]]
Please Note!!! the indexes (i,j)
point to any value you wish to get its neighbors in matrix x
One might wish to iterate over each point in matrix x
, get its neighbors
and do computation using the neighbors for instance in Image Processing, the convolution with a kernel. One might do the following to get neighbors of each pixel in an image x
for i in range(x.shape[0]):
for j in range(x.shape[1]):
i,j = 2,1
s,t = 2*d+i+1, 2*d+j+1
window = x_padded[i:s, j:t]
EDIT: ah crap, my answer is just writing im[i-d:i+d+1, j-d:j+d+1].flatten()
but written in a incomprehensible way :)
The good old sliding window trick may help here:
import numpy as np
from numpy.lib.stride_tricks import as_strided
def sliding_window(arr, window_size):
""" Construct a sliding window view of the array"""
arr = np.asarray(arr)
window_size = int(window_size)
if arr.ndim != 2:
raise ValueError("need 2-D input")
if not (window_size > 0):
raise ValueError("need a positive window size")
shape = (arr.shape[0] - window_size + 1,
arr.shape[1] - window_size + 1,
window_size, window_size)
if shape[0] <= 0:
shape = (1, shape[1], arr.shape[0], shape[3])
if shape[1] <= 0:
shape = (shape[0], 1, shape[2], arr.shape[1])
strides = (arr.shape[1]*arr.itemsize, arr.itemsize,
arr.shape[1]*arr.itemsize, arr.itemsize)
return as_strided(arr, shape=shape, strides=strides)
def cell_neighbors(arr, i, j, d):
"""Return d-th neighbors of cell (i, j)"""
w = sliding_window(arr, 2*d+1)
ix = np.clip(i - d, 0, w.shape[0]-1)
jx = np.clip(j - d, 0, w.shape[1]-1)
i0 = max(0, i - d - ix)
j0 = max(0, j - d - jx)
i1 = w.shape[2] - max(0, d - i + ix)
j1 = w.shape[3] - max(0, d - j + jx)
return w[ix, jx][i0:i1,j0:j1].ravel()
x = np.arange(8*8).reshape(8, 8)
print x
for d in [1, 2]:
for p in [(0,0), (0,1), (6,6), (8,8)]:
print "-- d=%d, %r" % (d, p)
print cell_neighbors(x, p[0], p[1], d=d)
Didn't do any timings here, but it's possible this version has reasonable performance.
For more info, search the net with phrases "rolling window numpy" or "sliding window numpy".
Have a look at scipy.ndimage.generic_filter.
As an example:
import numpy as np
import scipy.ndimage as ndimage
def test_func(values):
print values
return values.sum()
x = np.array([[1,2,3],[4,5,6],[7,8,9]])
footprint = np.array([[1,1,1],
[1,0,1],
[1,1,1]])
results = ndimage.generic_filter(x, test_func, footprint=footprint)
By default, it will "reflect" the values at the boundaries. You can control this with the mode
keyword argument.
However, if you're wanting to do something like this, there's a good chance that you can express your problem as a convolution of some sort. If so, it will be much faster to break it down into convolutional steps and use more optimized functions (e.g. most of scipy.ndimage
).