I am wondering why I\'m not able to allocate more that 1,000 MB of memory in my 32-bit .NET process. The following mini application throws an OutOfMemoryException after havi
Having enormous blocks of memory is never a good idea, even in 64bit. You get big problems with contiguous memory and fragmentation.
The problem here is finding a contiguous block. You could try enabling 3gb mode (which might help it find a few more bytes) but I really advise against it. The answers here are:
You might also want to read Eric Lippert's blog (he seems to have a blog entry for every common .NET question...)
I am truly sorry if I didn't get your point but:
static void Main(string[] args)
{
ArrayList list = new ArrayList();
int i = 0;
while (true)
{
using(byte newBt = new byte[1024 * 1024 * 10])
{
list.Add(newBt); // 10 MB
i += 10;
Console.WriteLine(i);
}
}
}
Have you tried the using method? And this might be a stupid question but why did you create an eternal loop? O if you try the code strip the symbols >.> xD.
Source: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/yh598w02(v=vs.80).aspx
I think the issue here is that this application will be adding 10MB with every loop it makes, and the loop is: "while(true)" which means it will adding these 10MBs till the application is stopped. So if it were to run for 100 loop it would have added close to 1GBs to RAM, and I'm assuming that it would have done this in less than 30 seconds. My point is you are trying to 10 megabyte's of memory per loop, in a never ending loop
You can allocate MUCH MORE memory than ~2 GB by building your application to a 64-bit architecture, which requires that you create a new build configuration in Visual Studio, and that build of the application will only run on 64-bit versions of Windows. In .NET, using the default "Any CPU" build option for your application, I find that I am only able to allocate about 1.5 GB of memory from the heap (even on 64-bit Windows machine), which is because the application actually only runs in 32-bit mode when it is built in "Any CPU" mode. But by compiling to x64 architecture, you can allocate much, much more memory from the heap during the execution of your application, and I will explain how to create a x64 build for your application below:
Again, using the normal (default) "Any CPU" build option in your .NET project, your application will ALWAYS run under 32-bit mode, even on a 64-bit Windows OS. Therefore you won't be able to allocate more than about 1.5 to 2 GB of RAM memory during application execution. To run your .NET application in true 64-bit mode, you will need to go into the build configuration manager and create a build type for the x64 architecture, and then recompile your program for x64 explicitly using that build type. The x64 build mode option can be created for your .NET solution using the following steps:
Using a 64-bit build of your application on a 64-bit Windows OS will allow your program to allocate much more than ~2GB of memory, presumably up to 2^64 address spaces (if you have the RAM and disk space available, which are the real limiting factors as of the time of writing this response).
If you're STILL running out of memory in your application, you can also increase the size of the Windows memory page file. On Windows, the page file allows the operating system to shift memory from RAM to the disk, if it runs out of RAM memory space. But there is a big time cost in shifting sections of RAM memory to and from the disk, so it may be a real hit on the performance of your application. Regardless of performance, by increasing the page size, you could (in theory) make the page file as large as there is free space available on the C: drive of your windows machine. In that case, your application would be able to allocate, for example, up to 4 TB of memory (or whatever amount of memory that your page file size is set to) during the execution of your program. To change the page file settings for your Windows machine, do the following:
Anyway, I hope this helps people understand why they can run into this 1.5 - 2 GB memory limitation issue in a .NET application, even when running on a 64-bit Windows machine. This can be a very confusing issue for people and I hope my explanation makes sense. Please feel free to message me with questions about this answer if needed.
The virtual address space limit of a Win32 process is 1.5GB (not entirely true). Additionally in the .NET frameworks there is a limiter to the % of memory a .NET process can consume. The machine.config has a processModel element with an attribute memoryLimit which is the % of available memory a process can consume. The default value is 60%.
If the machine you're running on has 2GB of memory or you haven't enabled the /3GB switch in your BOOT.INI then you're going to get ~1.3GB of memory per process.
I can't find the KB article but if I remember correctly .NET 1.x cannot address beyond the 1.5GB (1.8GB?) limit regardless of your settings.
http://blogs.msdn.com/tmarq/archive/2007/06/25/some-history-on-the-asp-net-cache-memory-limits.aspx http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/clr/thread/c50ea343-b41b-467d-a457-c5a735e4dfff http://www.guidanceshare.com/wiki/ASP.NET_1.1_Performance_Guidelines_-_Caching#Configure_the_Memory_Limit
I have recently been doing extensive profiling around memory limits in .NET on a 32bit process. We all get bombarded by the idea that we can allocate up to 2.4GB (2^31) in a .NET application but unfortunately this is not true :(. The application process has that much space to use and the operating system does a great job managing it for us, however, .NET itself seems to have its own overhead which accounts for approximately 600-800MB for typical real world applications that push the memory limit. This means that as soon as you allocate an array of integers that takes about 1.4GB, you should expect to see an OutOfMemoryException().
Obviously in 64bit, this limit occurs way later (let's chat in 5 years :)), but the general size of everything in memory also grows (I am finding it's ~1.7 to ~2 times) because of the increased word size.
What I know for sure is that the Virtual Memory idea from the operating system definitely does NOT give you virtually endless allocation space within one process. It is only there so that the full 2.4GB is addressable to all the (many) applications running at one time.
I hope this insight helps somewhat.
I originally answered something related here (I am still a newby so am not sure how I am supposed to do these links):
Is there a memory limit for a single .NET process