Git: Ignore files for public repository, but not for private

Question

I\'m deploying a Rails app on Heroku (for now) via git, and would also like to have a public version for people to look at. Some files are sensitive and should only be commi

Answer 1

One way to do this would be to put your private file(s) in a submodule, and refer to that module from your public repo. (Alternately, you could put your public files in a submodule, and refer to that repo from your private repo.)

Answer 2

Looks like a you could use mine.

Basically, it tells git to steer clear of stuff following the convention <file or directory>_mine_ and the tool itself gives you a snapshot, clean, and restore function, not full-fledged versioning, but for personal stuff it does the trick nicely.

The whole thing's pretty concise.

Answer 3

A guy named David Albert wrote a tool called Junk to solve almost exactly this problem. It lets files from a separate “junk drawer” repository live alongside the ones in your main repository.

The private files will have separate commits from the public ones, but it might do the job.

Answer 4

I will second the submodule answer, but try to provide some clarification. First, git does not deal with files but with commits. There is no way to filter files or paths in a branch because a branch is really a pointer to a commit. When you exclude or ignore you are just keeping files from being added to your repository. none of the 'sensitive files' files are even in the repository, just in your working directory.

The submodule is just a reference to another repository stored in your repository, and a specific commit that that checked out repository is tracking. you can say update using

git submodule update --recursive sensitive-files

In order to simplify things, you can commit symlinks in the proper place pointing to the submodule path.

ln -sf sensitive-files/shadow passwd

Then add the symlink as you would any other file..

Remember the submodule is just a checked out git repository, you can easily restrict access to that actual repository and make the main one public.

Updated:

Sorry I missed the notification, if you are still working on this.

You can have multiple symlinks in your private repository referencing the private repository (submodule) which is checked out in a subdirectory.Each of the databases or whatever used by the Rails instance could be a symlink into that private subdirectory.

Also, you don' t need a remote pointing to the private repository, just an entry in the .gitmodules file which is maintained automatically by git submodule. You would still need to protect the private repository so that only your Heroku instance could access it. For that I would suggest installing gitosis on a server if you can or use some other private git hosting solution. Add the public ssh key matching your instances private key tothe list of allowed users. (I'm not familiar with how to do this in Heroku.)

When you push your changes to heroku it should recursive download all the submodules mentioned in the repository.

Answer 5

I know this sidesteps the question, but I would simply have two git repositories. Then you can just add them permanently to the ignore list on the public repository.

You can have a second repository for the private files, and a small script to copy the changes to the correct location on the production system, when doing your deployment.

This reduces the risk that when you go on vacation and the new intern updates the public repo, your private information will accidentally get leaked. ;-)

Answer 6

You could create a pre-commit hook in your local repo, in here you can write a script to check the currently checked out branch and delete the offending files if they are present before the commit is processed. This avoids the files ever being recorded in the Git history of the wrong branch.

#!/bin/bash
current_branch="$(git branch | sed -e 's/^*//')"
if [ $current_branch != "heroku" ]; then 
    // Delete sensitive files before commit
    rm -f dir1/dir2/exclude_from_public
    rm -f dir1/dir2/exclude_from_public_also
fi
exit 0

Alternatively, the script could just check for the files and return exit code "1", notifying you that the commit cannot proceed because it contains sensitive files.

The caveat is that you will need to hand this script to anyone who is working on the "privileged" heroku branch, and always have it included in your own local repo.

Ideally you would have this check done server-side as well; but unfortunately GitHub only offers a Web variant of the post-receive hook, so unless you do you're own repo hosting this approach can only be performed locally.