Promise.resolve().then vs setImmediate vs nextTick

Question

NodeJS 0.11 as well as io.js and the Node 0.12 branch all ship with native promises.

Native promises have a .then method which always executes on a future event loop

Answer 1

Promise.resolve would be resolved straight away (syncroniously), while setImmediate explicitly straight after the execution of current event.

Answer 2

_{I'm not going to answer the bolded part about technicalities, but only the question}

Which should I use?

I don't think there is any reason to use Promise.resolve().then() unless you are interested in the promise for the result of your asynchronously executed function. Of course, if you are, then this would be far superior than dealing with callback hell or making a new Promise from setTimeout or nextTick.

There's also a second technical difference, more import than the timing: promises do swallow exceptions. Which you probably don't want. So, like @vkurchatkin mentioned, don't create promises only to throw them away. Not only because it's slower, but because it makes your code less readable and your app more error-prone.

Answer 3

Using Promise.resolve().then has no advantages over nextTick. It runs on the same queue, but have slightly higher priority, that is, promise handler can prevent next tick callback from ever running, the opposite is not possible. This behaviour is an implementation detail and should not be relied on.

Promise.resolve().then is obviously slower (a lot, I think), because it creates two promises which will be thrown away.

You can find extensive implementation info here: https://github.com/joyent/node/pull/8325

The most important part: Promise.resolve().then is like nextTick and not like setImmediate. Using it n place of setImmediate can change your code behaviour drastically.