Node.js is a perfect match for our web project, but there are few computational tasks for which we would prefer Python. We also already have a Python code for them. We are h
Update 2019
There are several ways to achieve this and here is the list in increasing order of complexity
Approach 1 Python Shell Simplest approach
source.js file
const ps = require('python-shell')
// very important to add -u option since our python script runs infinitely
var options = {
pythonPath: '/Users/zup/.local/share/virtualenvs/python_shell_test-TJN5lQez/bin/python',
pythonOptions: ['-u'], // get print results in real-time
// make sure you use an absolute path for scriptPath
scriptPath: "./subscriber/",
// args: ['value1', 'value2', 'value3'],
mode: 'json'
};
const shell = new ps.PythonShell("destination.py", options);
function generateArray() {
const list = []
for (let i = 0; i < 1000; i++) {
list.push(Math.random() * 1000)
}
return list
}
setInterval(() => {
shell.send(generateArray())
}, 1000);
shell.on("message", message => {
console.log(message);
})
destination.py file
import datetime
import sys
import time
import numpy
import talib
import timeit
import json
import logging
logging.basicConfig(format='%(asctime)s : %(levelname)s : %(message)s', level=logging.INFO)
size = 1000
p = 100
o = numpy.random.random(size)
h = numpy.random.random(size)
l = numpy.random.random(size)
c = numpy.random.random(size)
v = numpy.random.random(size)
def get_indicators(values):
# Return the RSI of the values sent from node.js
numpy_values = numpy.array(values, dtype=numpy.double)
return talib.func.RSI(numpy_values, 14)
for line in sys.stdin:
l = json.loads(line)
print(get_indicators(l))
# Without this step the output may not be immediately available in node
sys.stdout.flush()
Notes: Make a folder called subscriber which is at the same level as source.js file and put destination.py inside it. Dont forget to change your virtualenv environment
For communication between node.js and Python server, I would use Unix sockets if both processes run on the same server and TCP/IP sockets otherwise. For marshaling protocol I would take JSON or protocol buffer. If threaded Python shows up to be a bottleneck, consider using Twisted Python, which provides the same event driven concurrency as do node.js.
If you feel adventurous, learn clojure (clojurescript, clojure-py) and you'll get the same language that runs and interoperates with existing code on Java, JavaScript (node.js included), CLR and Python. And you get superb marshalling protocol by simply using clojure data structures.
I've had a lot of success using thoonk.js along with thoonk.py. Thoonk leverages Redis (in-memory key-value store) to give you feed (think publish/subscribe), queue and job patterns for communication.
Why is this better than unix sockets or direct tcp sockets? Overall performance may be decreased a little, however Thoonk provides a really simple API that simplifies having to manually deal with a socket. Thoonk also helps make it really trivial to implement a distributed computing model that allows you to scale your python workers to increase performance, since you just spin up new instances of your python workers and connect them to the same redis server.
This sounds like a scenario where zeroMQ would be a good fit. It's a messaging framework that's similar to using TCP or Unix sockets, but it's much more robust (http://zguide.zeromq.org/py:all)
There's a library that uses zeroMQ to provide a RPC framework that works pretty well. It's called zeroRPC (http://www.zerorpc.io/). Here's the hello world.
Python "Hello x" server:
import zerorpc
class HelloRPC(object):
'''pass the method a name, it replies "Hello name!"'''
def hello(self, name):
return "Hello, {0}!".format(name)
def main():
s = zerorpc.Server(HelloRPC())
s.bind("tcp://*:4242")
s.run()
if __name__ == "__main__" : main()
And the node.js client:
var zerorpc = require("zerorpc");
var client = new zerorpc.Client();
client.connect("tcp://127.0.0.1:4242");
//calls the method on the python object
client.invoke("hello", "World", function(error, reply, streaming) {
if(error){
console.log("ERROR: ", error);
}
console.log(reply);
});
Or vice-versa, node.js server:
var zerorpc = require("zerorpc");
var server = new zerorpc.Server({
hello: function(name, reply) {
reply(null, "Hello, " + name, false);
}
});
server.bind("tcp://0.0.0.0:4242");
And the python client
import zerorpc, sys
c = zerorpc.Client()
c.connect("tcp://127.0.0.1:4242")
name = sys.argv[1] if len(sys.argv) > 1 else "dude"
print c.hello(name)
If you arrange to have your Python worker in a separate process (either long-running server-type process or a spawned child on demand), your communication with it will be asynchronous on the node.js side. UNIX/TCP sockets and stdin/out/err communication are inherently async in node.
I'd consider also Apache Thrift http://thrift.apache.org/
It can bridge between several programming languages, is highly efficient and has support for async or sync calls. See full features here http://thrift.apache.org/docs/features/
The multi language can be useful for future plans, for example if you later want to do part of the computational task in C++ it's very easy to do add it to the mix using Thrift.