Is ternary operator, if-else or logical OR faster in javascript?

后端 未结 7 1476
情歌与酒
情歌与酒 2020-11-30 02:06

Which method is faster or more responsive in javascript, if-else, the ternary operator or logical OR? Which is advisable to use, for what reasons?

相关标签:
7条回答
  • 2020-11-30 02:40

    Seems like nobody did any actual profiling. Here's the code I used:

    test = function() {
        for (var i = 0; i < 10000000; i++) {
            var a = i < 100 ? 1 : 2;
    
            /*
            if(i < 100) {
                var a = 1;
            }else{
                var a = 2;
            }
            */
        }
    }
    
    test();
    

    Using the if/else block instead of the ternary operator yields a 1.5 - 2x performance increase in Google Chrome v21 under OS X Snow Leopard.

    As one use case where this is very important, synthesizing real-time audio is becoming more and more common with JavaScript. This type of performance difference is a big deal when an algorithm is running 44100 times a second.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-11-30 02:41

    I'm doing another syntax:

    var a = true,
        b;
    
    b = (a == false) 
        ? true // if a == false, b = true
        : false; // else: a == true so b = false
    
        /* Equivalent of
        if(a == true)
          var b = true;
        else
          var b = false;
    

    Some people like my code and tell me it's simple to read.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-11-30 02:48

    I didn't think @charlie robert's test was fair

    Here's my jsperf

    result:

    1. strict equal is the fastest
    2. strict ternary is 33% slower
    3. truthy falsy is 49% slower
    4. ternary truthy falsy is 55% slower
    5. if else and ternary are roughly the same.

    normal equal and normal ternary slowest.

    strict equals:

    var a = true, b;
    
    if (a === true) {
      b = true;
    } else {
      b = false
    }
    if (a === false) {
      b = true;
    } else {
      b = false;
    }
    

    ternary strict equals

    var a = true, b;
    
    b = (a === true) ? true : false;
    
    b = (a === false) ? true : false;
    

    simple equality

     var a = true, b;
    
        if (a == true) {
          b = true;
        } else {
          b = false;
        }
    
        if (a == false) {
          b = true;
        } else {
          b = false;
        }
    

    simple ternary equality

     var a = true, b;
        b = (a == true) ? true : false;
    
        b = (a == false) ? true : false;
    

    truthy / falsy

    var a = true, b;
    if (a) {
      b = true;
    } else {
      b = false;
    }
    
    if (!a) {
      b = true;
    } else {
      b = false;
    }
    

    ternary truthy / falsy

    var a = true, b;
    b = (a) ? true : false;
    b = (!a) ? true : false;
    
    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-11-30 02:48

    Ternary operator is only syntactic sugar, not a performance booster.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-11-30 02:52

    to charlie roberts' answer above, I would add:

    the following link gives some incisive answers; the result for switches in Firefox being the most striking: http://jsperf.com/if-else-vs-arrays-vs-switch-vs-ternary/39

    Those who question why anyone would investigate optimization to this degree would do well to research WebGL!

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-11-30 02:54

    The speed difference will be negligible - use whichever you find to be more readable. In other words I highly doubt that a bottleneck in your code will be due to using the wrong conditional construct.

    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题