I want to inject a service into a class that is not a component.
For example:
Myservice
import {Injectable} from \'
Injections only works with classes that are instantiated by Angulars dependency injection (DI).
@Injectable()
to MyClass
andMyClass
like providers: [MyClass]
in a component or NgModule.When you then inject MyClass
somewhere, a MyService
instance gets passed to MyClass
when it is instantiated by DI (before it is injected the first time).
constructor(private injector:Injector) {
let resolvedProviders = ReflectiveInjector.resolve([MyClass]);
let childInjector = ReflectiveInjector.fromResolvedProviders(resolvedProviders, this.injector);
let myClass : MyClass = childInjector.get(MyClass);
}
This way myClass
will be a MyClass
instance, instantiated by Angulars DI, and myService
will be injected to MyClass
when instantiated.
See also Getting dependency from Injector manually inside a directive
constructor(ms:myService)
let myClass = new MyClass(ms);
This is kind of (very) hacky, but I thought I'd share my solution as well. Note that this will only work with Singleton services (injected at app root, not component!), since they live as long as your application, and there's only ever one instance of them.
First, in your service:
@Injectable()
export class MyService {
static instance: MyService;
constructor() {
MyService.instance = this;
}
doSomething() {
console.log("something!");
}
}
Then in any class:
export class MyClass {
constructor() {
MyService.instance.doSomething();
}
}
This solution is good if you want to reduce code clutter and aren't using non-singleton services anyway.
Not a direct answer to the question, but if you're reading this SO for the reason I am this may help...
Let's say you're using ng2-translate and you really want your User.ts
class to have it. You're immediate thought is to use DI to put it in, you are doing Angular after all. But that's kind of overthinking it, you can just pass it in your constructor, or make it a public variable you set from the component (where you presumably did DI it in).
e.g.:
import { TranslateService } from "ng2-translate";
export class User {
public translateService: TranslateService; // will set from components.
// a bunch of awesome User methods
}
then from some user-related component that injected TranslateService
addEmptyUser() {
let emptyUser = new User("", "");
emptyUser.translateService = this.translateService;
this.users.push(emptyUser);
}
Hopefully this helps those out there like me who were about to write a lot of harder to maintain code because we're too clever sometimes =]
(NOTE: the reason you may want to set a variable instead of making it part of your constructor method is you could have cases where you don't need to use the service, so always being required to pass it in would mean introducing extra imports/code that are never really used)
locator.service.ts
import {Injector} from "@angular/core";
export class ServiceLocator {
static injector: Injector;
}
app.module.ts
@NgModule({ ... })
export class AppModule {
constructor(private injector: Injector) {
ServiceLocator.injector = injector;
}
}
poney.model.ts
export class Poney {
id: number;
name: string;
color: 'black' | 'white' | 'brown';
service: PoneyService = ServiceLocator.injector.get(PoneyService); // <--- HERE !!!
// PoneyService is @injectable and registered in app.module.ts
}
If your service methods are pure functions, a clean way to solve this is to have static members in your service.
your service
import {Injectable} from '@angular/core';
@Injectable()
export class myService{
public static dosomething(){
//implementation => doesn't use `this`
}
}
your class
export class MyClass{
test(){
MyService.dosomething(); //no need to inject in constructor
}
}