I have three classes one of the names is User and this user has other classes instances. Like this;
public class User{
@OneToMany(fetch=FetchType.LAZY, ca
As I explained in this article and in my book, High-Performance Java Persistence, you should never use the unidirectional @OneToMany
annotation because:
Now, in your first example, both sides are owning the association, and this is bad.
While the @JoinColumn
would let the @OneToMany
side in charge of the association, it's definitely not the best choice. Therefore, always use the mappedBy
attribute on the @OneToMany
side.
public class User{
@OneToMany(fetch=FetchType.LAZY, cascade = CascadeType.ALL, mappedBy="user")
public List<APost> aPosts;
@OneToMany(fetch=FetchType.LAZY, cascade = CascadeType.ALL, mappedBy="user")
public List<BPost> bPosts;
}
public class BPost extends Post {
@ManyToOne(fetch=FetchType.LAZY)
public User user;
}
public class APost extends Post {
@ManyToOne(fetch=FetchType.LAZY)
public User user;
}
I am not really sure about your question (the meaning of "empty table" etc, or how mappedBy
and JoinColumn
were not working).
I think you were trying to do a bi-directional relationships.
First, you need to decide which side "owns" the relationship. Hibernate is going to setup the relationship base on that side. For example, assume I make the Post
side own the relationship (I am simplifying your example, just to keep things in point), the mapping will look like:
(Wish the syntax is correct. I am writing them just by memory. However the idea should be fine)
public class User{
@OneToMany(fetch=FetchType.LAZY, cascade = CascadeType.ALL, mappedBy="user")
private List<Post> posts;
}
public class Post {
@ManyToOne(fetch=FetchType.LAZY)
@JoinColumn(name="user_id")
private User user;
}
By doing so, the table for Post
will have a column user_id
which store the relationship. Hibernate is getting the relationship by the user
in Post
(Instead of posts
in User
. You will notice the difference if you have Post
's user
but missing User
's posts
).
You have mentioned mappedBy
and JoinColumn
is not working. However, I believe this is in fact the correct way. Please tell if this approach is not working for you, and give us a bit more info on the problem. I believe the problem is due to something else.
Edit:
Just a bit extra information on the use of mappedBy
as it is usually confusing at first. In mappedBy
, we put the "property name" in the opposite side of the bidirectional relationship, not table column name.