http://norbauer.com/notebooks/code/notes/git-revert-reset-a-single-file
I have found a post.
But still don\'t know what is the difference between
Anything following the --
is treated as a filename (not as a program argument). This is important if, for example, you have filenames which start with dashes.
The special "option" --
means "treat every argument after this point as a file name, no matter what it looks like." This is not Git-specific, it's a general Unix command line convention. Normally you use it to clarify that an argument is a file name rather than an option, e.g.
rm -f # does nothing
rm -- -f # deletes a file named "-f"
git checkout
1 also takes --
to mean that subsequent arguments are not its optional "treeish" parameter specifying which commit you want.
So in this context it's safe to use --
always, but you need it when the file you want to revert has a name that begins with -
, or is the same as the name of a branch. Some examples for branch/file disambiguation:
git checkout README # would normally discard uncommitted changes
# to the _file_ "README"
git checkout master # would normally switch the working copy to
# the _branch_ "master"
git checkout -- master # discard uncommitted changes to the _file_ "master"
and option/file disambiguation:
git checkout -p -- README # interactively discard uncommitted changes
# to the file "README"
git checkout -- -p README # unconditionally discard all uncommitted
# changes to the files "-p" and "README"
I'm not sure what you do if you have a branch whose name begins with -
. Perhaps don't do that in the first place.
1 in this mode; "checkout" can do several other things as well. I have never understood why git chose to implement "discard uncommitted changes" as a mode of the "checkout" subcommand, rather than "revert" like most other VCSes, or "reset" which I think might make more sense in git's own terms.