EC2 instance types's exact network performance?

后端 未结 3 509
花落未央
花落未央 2020-11-29 14:45

I cannot find exact network performance details for different EC2 instance types on Amazon. Instead, they are only saying:

  • High
  • Moderate
  • Low<
相关标签:
3条回答
  • 2020-11-29 15:19

    FWIW CloudFront supports streaming as well. Might be better than plain streaming from instances.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-11-29 15:19

    Almost everything in EC2 is multi-tenant. What the network performance indicates is what priority you will have compared with other instances sharing the same infrastructure.

    If you need a guaranteed level of bandwidth, then EC2 will likely not work well for you.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-11-29 15:36

    Bandwidth is tiered by instance size, here's a comprehensive answer:

    For t2/m3/c3/c4/r3/i2/d2 instances:

    • t2.nano = ??? (Based on the scaling factors, I'd expect 20-30 MBit/s)
    • t2.micro = ~70 MBit/s (qiita says 63 MBit/s) - t1.micro gets about ~100 Mbit/s
    • t2.small = ~125 MBit/s (t2, qiita says 127 MBit/s, cloudharmony says 125 Mbit/s with spikes to 200+ Mbit/s)
    • *.medium = t2.medium gets 250-300 MBit/s, m3.medium ~400 MBit/s
    • *.large = ~450-600 MBit/s (the most variation, see below)
    • *.xlarge = 700-900 MBit/s
    • *.2xlarge = ~1 GBit/s +- 10%
    • *.4xlarge = ~2 GBit/s +- 10%
    • *.8xlarge and marked specialty = 10 Gbit, expect ~8.5 GBit/s, requires enhanced networking & VPC for full throughput

    m1 small, medium, and large instances tend to perform higher than expected. c1.medium is another freak, at 800 MBit/s.

    I gathered this by combing dozens of sources doing benchmarks (primarily using iPerf & TCP connections). Credit to CloudHarmony & flux7 in particular for many of the benchmarks (note that those two links go to google searches showing the numerous individual benchmarks).

    Caveats & Notes:

    The large instance size has the most variation reported:

    • m1.large is ~800 Mbit/s (!!!)
    • t2.large = ~500 MBit/s
    • c3.large = ~500-570 Mbit/s (different results from different sources)
    • c4.large = ~520 MBit/s (I've confirmed this independently, by the way)
    • m3.large is better at ~700 MBit/s
    • m4.large is ~445 Mbit/s
    • r3.large is ~390 Mbit/s

    Burstable (T2) instances appear to exhibit burstable networking performance too:

    • The CloudHarmony iperf benchmarks show initial transfers start at 1 GBit/s and then gradually drop to the sustained levels above after a few minutes. PDF links to reports below:

    • t2.small (PDF)

    • t2.medium (PDF)
    • t2.large (PDF)

    Note that these are within the same region - if you're transferring across regions, real performance may be much slower. Even for the larger instances, I'm seeing numbers of a few hundred MBit/s.

    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题