I have three different ways to initialize and render a view and its subviews, and each one of them has different problems. I\'m curious to know if there is a better way that
This is a great question. Backbone is great because of the lack of assumptions it makes, but it does mean you have to (decide how to) implement things like this yourself. After looking through my own stuff, I find that I (kind of) use a mix of scenario 1 and scenario 2. I don't think a 4th magical scenario exists because, simply enough, everything you do in scenario 1 & 2 must be done.
I think it'd be easiest to explain how I like to handle it with an example. Say I have this simple page broken into the specified views:
Say the HTML is, after being rendered, something like this:
<div id="parent">
<div id="name">Person: Kevin Peel</div>
<div id="info">
First name: <span class="first_name">Kevin</span><br />
Last name: <span class="last_name">Peel</span><br />
</div>
<div>Phone Numbers:</div>
<div id="phone_numbers">
<div>#1: 123-456-7890</div>
<div>#2: 456-789-0123</div>
</div>
</div>
Hopefully it's pretty obvious how the HTML matches up with the diagram.
The ParentView
holds 2 child views, InfoView
and PhoneListView
as well as a few extra divs, one of which, #name
, needs to be set at some point. PhoneListView
holds child views of its own, an array of PhoneView
entries.
So on to your actual question. I handle initialization and rendering differently based on the view type. I break my views into two types, Parent
views and Child
views.
The difference between them is simple, Parent
views hold child views while Child
views do not. So in my example, ParentView
and PhoneListView
are Parent
views, while InfoView
and the PhoneView
entries are Child
views.
Like I mentioned before, the biggest difference between these two categories is when they're allowed to render. In a perfect world, I want Parent
views to only ever render once. It is up to their child views to handle any re-rendering when the model(s) change. Child
views, on the other hand, I allow to re-render anytime they need since they don't have any other views relying upon them.
In a little more detail, for Parent
views I like my initialize
functions to do a few things:
InfoView
would be assigned #info
).Step 1 is pretty self explanatory.
Step 2, the rendering, is done so that any elements the child views rely on already exist before I try to assign them. By doing this, I know all child events
will be correctly set, and I can re-render their blocks as many times as I want without worrying about having to re-delegate anything. I do not actually render
any child views here, I allow them to do that within their own initialization
.
Steps 3 and 4 are actually handled at the same time as I pass el
in while creating the child view. I like to pass an element in here as I feel the parent should determine where in its own view the child is allowed to put its content.
For rendering, I try to keep it pretty simple for Parent
views. I want the render
function to do nothing more than render the parent view. No event delegation, no rendering of child views, nothing. Just a simple render.
Sometimes this doesn't always work though. For instance in my example above, the #name
element will need to be updated any time the name within the model changes. However, this block is part of the ParentView
template and not handled by a dedicated Child
view, so I work around that. I will create some sort of subRender
function that only replaces the content of the #name
element, and not have to trash the whole #parent
element. This may seem like a hack, but I've really found it works better than having to worry about re-rendering the whole DOM and reattaching elements and such. If I really wanted to make it clean, I'd create a new Child
view (similar to the InfoView
) that would handle the #name
block.
Now for Child
views, the initialization
is pretty similar to Parent
views, just without the creation of any further Child
views. So:
Child
view rendering is also very simple, just render and set the content of my el
. Again, no messing with delegation or anything like that.
Here is some example code of what my ParentView
may look like:
var ParentView = Backbone.View.extend({
el: "#parent",
initialize: function() {
// Step 1, (init) I want to know anytime the name changes
this.model.bind("change:first_name", this.subRender, this);
this.model.bind("change:last_name", this.subRender, this);
// Step 2, render my own view
this.render();
// Step 3/4, create the children and assign elements
this.infoView = new InfoView({el: "#info", model: this.model});
this.phoneListView = new PhoneListView({el: "#phone_numbers", model: this.model});
},
render: function() {
// Render my template
this.$el.html(this.template());
// Render the name
this.subRender();
},
subRender: function() {
// Set our name block and only our name block
$("#name").html("Person: " + this.model.first_name + " " + this.model.last_name);
}
});
You can see my implementation of subRender
here. By having changes bound to subRender
instead of render
, I don't have to worry about blasting away and rebuilding the whole block.
Here's example code for the InfoView
block:
var InfoView = Backbone.View.extend({
initialize: function() {
// I want to re-render on changes
this.model.bind("change", this.render, this);
// Render
this.render();
},
render: function() {
// Just render my template
this.$el.html(this.template());
}
});
The binds are the important part here. By binding to my model, I never have to worry about manually calling render
myself. If the model changes, this block will re-render itself without affecting any other views.
The PhoneListView
will be similar to the ParentView
, you'll just need a little more logic in both your initialization
and render
functions to handle collections. How you handle the collection is really up to you, but you'll at least need to be listening to the collection events and deciding how you want to render (append/remove, or just re-render the whole block). I personally like to append new views and remove old ones, not re-render the whole view.
The PhoneView
will be almost identical to the InfoView
, only listening to the model changes it cares about.
Hopefully this has helped a little, please let me know if anything is confusing or not detailed enough.