I don't quite understand the question you are asking. I mean, you have already given the answer yourself, before even asking the question: &&
binds tighter than =
while and
binds less tightly than =
.
So, in the first case, the expression is evaluated as follows:
( a=f(2) ) and ( b=f(4) )
( a= 2 ) and ( b=f(4) )
2 and ( b=f(4) ) # a=2
2 and ( b= 4 ) # a=2
2 and 4 # a=2; b=4
4 # a=2; b=4
In the second case, the evaluation is as follows:
a = ( f(2) && ( b=f(4) ) )
a = ( 2 && ( b=f(4) ) )
a = ( 2 && ( b= 4 ) )
a = ( 2 && 4 ) # b=4
a = 4 # b=4
4 # b=4; a=4