List assignment with [:]

后端 未结 6 1036
小蘑菇
小蘑菇 2020-11-29 09:42

What\'s the difference between

list = range(100)

and

list[:] = range(100)

in Python?

EDI

相关标签:
6条回答
  • 2020-11-29 10:02

    list[:] specifies a range within the list, in this case it defines the complete range of the list, i.e. the whole list and changes them. list=range(100), on the other hand, kind of wipes out the original contents of list and sets the new contents.

    But try the following:

    a=[1,2,3,4]
    
    a[0:2]=[5,6]
    
    a # prints [5,6,3,4]
    

    You see, we changed the first two elements with the assignment. This means, using this notation, you can change several elements in the list once.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-11-29 10:03

    The first one redefines the built-in name list to point to some list.

    The second fails with TypeError: 'type' object does not support item assignment.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-11-29 10:04

    list[:] will only work if there is already an object named list that allows slice assignment.

    Also, you shouldn't name variables list because there is a built-in named list which is the list type itself.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-11-29 10:06
    list[:] = range(100)
    

    won't work on uninitialized variable, as it is modifying it. The [:] specifies the whole list/touple.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-11-29 10:11

    When you do

    lst = anything
    

    You're pointing the name lst at an object. It doesn't change the old object lst used to point to in any way, though if nothing else pointed to that object its reference count will drop to zero and it will get deleted.

    When you do

    lst[:] = whatever
    

    You're iterating over whatever, creating an intermediate tuple, and assigning each item of the tuple to an index in the already existing lst object. That means if multiple names point to the same object, you will see the change reflected when you reference any of the names, just as if you use append or extend or any of the other in-place operations.

    An example of the difference:

    >>> lst = range(1, 4)
    >>> id(lst)
    74339392
    >>> lst = [1, 2, 3]
    >>> id(lst)  # different; you pointed lst at a new object
    73087936
    >>> lst[:] = range(1, 4)
    >>> id(lst)  # the same, you iterated over the list returned by range
    73087936
    >>> lst = xrange(1, 4)
    >>> lst
    xrange(1, 4)   # not a list, an xrange object
    >>> id(lst)   # and different
    73955976
    >>> lst = [1, 2, 3]
    >>> id(lst)    # again different
    73105320
    >>> lst[:] = xrange(1, 4) # this gets read temporarily into a tuple
    >>> id(lst)   # the same, because you iterated over the xrange
    73105320
    >>> lst    # and still a list
    [1, 2, 3]
    

    When it comes to speed, slice assignment is slower. See Python Slice Assignment Memory Usage for more information about its memory usage.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-11-29 10:15

    [:] is also useful to make a deep copy of the list.

    def x(l):
        f=l[:]
        g=l
        l.append(8)
        print "l", l
        print "g", g
        print "f", f
    
    l = range(3)
    
    print l
     #[0, 1, 2]
    
    x(l)
     #l [0, 1, 2, 8]
     #g [0, 1, 2, 8]
     #f [0, 1, 2]
    
    print l
    #[0, 1, 2, 8]
    

    Modification to l is get reflected in g (because, both point to same list, in fact, both g and l are just names in python), not in f(because, it's a copy of l)

    But, in your case, It doesn't make any difference. (Though, I'm not eligible to comment on any memory usage of both methods.)

    Edit

    h = range(3)
    id(h) #141312204 
    h[:]=range(3)
    id(h) #141312204 
    h=range(3)
    id(h) #141312588 
    

    list[:] = range(100) updates the list list = range(100) creates new list.

    @agf: thanks for pointing my error

    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题