Ok so I have a placeholder with a nested selector:
%block {
.title {
font-size:12px;
}
}
I want to extend it and ADD to the .
You can use a tools, I used it to clean the css https://github.com/addyosmani/grunt-uncss
"A grunt task for removing unused CSS from your projects with UnCSS."
LESS can do that. However you would write:
.superblock {
.title {
.block .title;
}
}
Not sure if it works with @extend too.
Sass has no functionality for "merging" duplicate selectors. You'll need to find another utility to do this after the CSS has been compiled.
The @extend
directive isn't just a way to use classes in place of mixins (similar to LESS style mixin calls). Why @extend
works the way it does becomes clear when you're extending normal classes instead of extend classes:
.block {
font-size:12px;
}
.foo {
@extend .block;
font-weight: bold;
}
Output:
.block, .foo {
font-size: 12px;
}
.foo {
font-weight: bold;
}
Using an extend class just suppresses the emission of the original class name.
Now that you've seen why @extend
works the way it does, do you still want what @extend
offers? If the answer is no, then you need to use a mixin:
@mixin block {
// styles
.title {
font-size: 12px;
@content;
}
}
.superblock {
@include block {
font-weight: bold;
}
}
Output:
.superblock .title {
font-size: 12px;
font-weight: bold;
}
This is pretty much it. SASS produces extended declarations separately.
And it has no functionality of grouping declarations by selector, it's not that smart.
But you need not worry that much about CSS cleanness. Modern web servers serve CSS gzipped, all duplication will be nicely compressed.