Instantiating a context in LINQ to Entities

前端 未结 2 391
野性不改
野性不改 2020-11-29 06:17

I\'ve seen two different manners that programmers approach when creating an entity context in their code.

The first is like such, and you can find it all over the MS

相关标签:
2条回答
  • 2020-11-29 06:17

    The second option actually does not clean up after itself if that's what you mean. I prefer the using ObjectContext version every time because I don't have to dispose it after. Not sure I got the question right though... Too many hours programming today.

    public class UserManagerRepository : IUserManagerRepository, IDisposable
    {
        private readonly Entities _context = new Entities();
        private bool _disposed;
    
        public User Create(User user, int countryId)
        {
            user.Country = GetCountry(countryId);
            _context.AddToUser(user);
            _context.SaveChanges();
            return user;
        }
    }
    

    Then to use this repository I do something like:

    using(var repository = new UserManagerRepository())
    {
        repository.Create(user);
    }
    
    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-11-29 06:28

    Creating a new ObjectContext each time does involve 'some' overhead. Essentially the overhead involved is copying metadata from a global cache into metadata associated with the specific ObjectContext.

    This overhead is relatively minor, so often it is not worth worrying about, especially when you consider the extra safety inherent in the using pattern.

    For me which option you choose depends upon things like:

    1. How long lived is your wrapping class likely to be? If it lives for a long time the ObjectContext might grow to hold a lot of entities slowing down over time. So a new ObjectContext each time might be a good idea.
    2. Are calls to the methods on your wrapping class synchronized? The ObjectContext class itself is not threadsafe so if you use the second pattern you need to make sure your wrapping class / repository is thread safe if you expect multiple threads to call it.
    3. Are the methods essentially unrelated? If so you might get unexpected side-effects if they share one context between the methods.

    In general my recommendation is that if the methods are stateless, i.e. fire and forget a new context for each method is probably a good idea.

    If however you have a relatively short lived stateful form or something then maybe a shared context is a better idea.

    UPDATE: I've taken the time to put together a more complete answer

    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题