I understand implicit parameters and implicit conversions in Scala but I saw this for the first time today: the implicit keyword in front of a parameter in an anonymous func
In my understanding, the keyword of Implicit means Let complier do the job
Declaring an implicit variable means it can be used for implicit parameter of other methods inside the scope. In other words, the variable is being considered by the compiler to fill in implicit parameters.
def index = Action { implicit request =>
val str = sayHi("Jason")
Ok(views.html.index("Your new application is ready." + str))
}
private def sayHi(name: String)(implicit req: Request[AnyContent]) = name + ", you can the following content" + req.body
I declare an implicit parameter req
in sayHi
with type Request[AnyContent]
, however, I can call the method with only first parameter sayHi("Jason")
because the implicit parameter req
is filled in by the compiler to reference the implicit variable request
There are two distinct features here.
First, request
isn't really an argument in a method invocation. It's the argument of an anonymous function. The anonymous function itself is the argument of the method invocation.
Second, declaring an implicit argument in an anonymous function have the convenience of saving you from "forcing" a val into a implicit:
Action { request =>
implicit val r = request
Ok("Got request [" + request + "]")
}
I happen to know this a Play framework code, but I am not sure what are the signatures for Action and Ok. I will guess that they are something like that:
def Action(r:Request => Result):Unit
case class Ok(str:msg)(implicit r:Request)
Again, it's pure guessing for illustrative purposes only.
Found a few resources:
https://issues.scala-lang.org/browse/SI-1492
https://stackoverflow.com/a/5015161/480674
search for "Implicit arguments in closures" on the second link