I need to write a extended version of the StringUtils.commaDelimitedListToStringArray function which gets an additional parameter: the escape char.
so calling my:
As matt b said, [^\\],
will interpret the character preceding the comma as a part of the delimiter.
"test\\\\\\,test\\\\,test\\,test,test"
-(split)->
["test\\\\\\,test\\\\,test\\,tes" , "test"]
As drvdijk said, (?<!\\),
will misinterpret escaped backslashes.
"test\\\\\\,test\\\\,test\\,test,test"
-(split)->
["test\\\\\\,test\\\\,test\\,test" , "test"]
-(unescape commas)->
["test\\\\,test\\,test,test" , "test"]
I would expect being able to escape backslashes as well...
"test\\\\\\,test\\\\,test\\,test,test"
-(split)->
["test\\\\\\,test\\\\" , "test\\,test" , "test"]
-(unescape commas and backslashes)->
["test\\,test\\" , "test,test" , "test"]
drvdijk suggested (?<=(?<!\\\\)(\\\\\\\\){0,100}),
which works well for lists with elements ending with up to 100 backslashes. This is far enough... but why a limit? Is there a more efficient way (isn't lookbehind greedy)? What about invalid strings?
I searched for a while for a generic solution, then I wrote the thing myself... The idea is to split following a pattern that matches the list elements (instead of matching the delimiter).
My answer does not take the escape character as a parameter.
public static List<String> commaDelimitedListStringToStringList(String list) {
// Check the validity of the list
// ex: "te\\st" is not valid, backslash should be escaped
if (!list.matches("^(([^\\\\,]|\\\\,|\\\\\\\\)*(,|$))+")) {
// Could also raise an exception
return null;
}
// Matcher for the list elements
Matcher matcher = Pattern
.compile("(?<=(^|,))([^\\\\,]|\\\\,|\\\\\\\\)*(?=(,|$))")
.matcher(list);
ArrayList<String> result = new ArrayList<String>();
while (matcher.find()) {
// Unescape the list element
result.add(matcher.group().replaceAll("\\\\([\\\\,])", "$1"));
}
return result;
}
Description for the pattern (unescaped):
(?<=(^|,))
forward is start of string or a ,
([^\\,]|\\,|\\\\)*
the element composed of \,
, \\
or characters wich are neither \
nor ,
(?=(,|$))
behind is end of string or a ,
The pattern may be simplified.
Even with the 3 parsings (matches
+ find
+ replaceAll
), this method seems faster than the one suggested by drvdijk. It can still be optimized by writing a specific parser.
Also, what is the need of having an escape character if only one character is special, it could simply be doubled...
public static List<String> commaDelimitedListStringToStringList2(String list) {
if (!list.matches("^(([^,]|,,)*(,|$))+")) {
return null;
}
Matcher matcher = Pattern.compile("(?<=(^|,))([^,]|,,)*(?=(,|$))")
.matcher(list);
ArrayList<String> result = new ArrayList<String>();
while (matcher.find()) {
result.add(matcher.group().replaceAll(",,", ","));
}
return result;
}
For future reference, here is the complete method i ended up with:
public static String[] commaDelimitedListToStringArray(String str, String escapeChar) {
// these characters need to be escaped in a regular expression
String regularExpressionSpecialChars = "/.*+?|()[]{}\\";
String escapedEscapeChar = escapeChar;
// if the escape char for our comma separated list needs to be escaped
// for the regular expression, escape it using the \ char
if(regularExpressionSpecialChars.indexOf(escapeChar) != -1)
escapedEscapeChar = "\\" + escapeChar;
// see http://stackoverflow.com/questions/820172/how-to-split-a-comma-separated-string-while-ignoring-escaped-commas
String[] temp = str.split("(?<!" + escapedEscapeChar + "),", -1);
// remove the escapeChar for the end result
String[] result = new String[temp.length];
for(int i=0; i<temp.length; i++) {
result[i] = temp[i].replaceAll(escapedEscapeChar + ",", ",");
}
return result;
}
Try:
String array[] = str.split("(?<!\\\\),");
Basically this is saying split on a comma, except where that comma is preceded by two backslashes. This is called a negative lookbehind zero-width assertion.
The regular expression
[^\\],
means "match a character which is not a backslash followed by a comma" - this is why patterns such as t,
are matching, because t
is a character which is not a backslash.
I think you need to use some sort of negative lookbehind, to capture a ,
which is not preceded by a \
without capturing the preceding character, something like
(?<!\\),
(BTW, note that I have purposefully not doubly-escaped the backslashes to make this more readable)